MACHINE OPERATORS
n 5
f as e, the speed at which the apparatus worked made
almost impossible even to see the cube’s position after
lt: had been placed; for the arm would cover the cube before
the hand could be taken away. Sometimes, the hand
Was not taken away quickly enough and the revolving
arm collided with it, slowing down its revolution. This
w °uld still further increase the difficulty of scoring. Add
to this the fact that it required the experimenter’s entire
a ttention to keep the apparatus moving properly, and it
be seen that the difficulties of obtaining a proper score
0n an individual’s performance were almost insurmountabIe
- This difficulty naturally deprived the apparatus of
^uch of its value as a test. A third important drawback
the difficulty of revolving the arms at speeds which
'''ere both constant and readily adaptable to the purposes
of the test. The electrical control which was tried
w as found much too troublesome and expensive for
the purpose.
spite of these difficulties, it seemed as if the principle
^ the test were correct and, therefore, it was decided to
esig n a s i m q ar apparatus which would obviate the difficulties
found in the original. In designing this test, the
step was to find out exactly what kind of work maim
st
chine
operators were doing. It seemed unreasonable from
e outset to assume that one test could apply equally
th
Wel1 to all kinds of machine operators, for the work of
°P e rators is as variegated as the work of clerks, stenogra
phers, packers, assemblers, and others. If special tests
^ ere needed for these varieties of work, it seemed logical
su ppose that machine operators of different kinds
^°uld also require different kinds of tests. Therefore,
ai y one type of machine was chosen. The operation
a hy chosen was that of hand-feed dial machines. A dial