J 52
EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGY
This test was given first to thirty machine operators in a
large shop. It was found that some of the best operators
were poorest in this test and vice versa. In other words,
literacy was not essential to operating ability. It was
obvious, therefore, that if this test were used as a basis for
selection, some extremely good operators would be eliminated.
For this reason, it was decided to give the tests
in the employment office in an experimental rather than
in a final way, pending the further determination of the
practical results.
Over one hundred applicants were given this test and
hired regardless of their work in it. At the same time,
however, the spatial perceptions form-board test described
in Chapter IV was also given. The value of this test was
immediately apparent, both because of the ease with
which it could be given and the qualities which it tested.
Any individual, of any tongue, could understand quickly
the essential problem; namely, putting the pieces back
into their proper place. And in doing this, a certain kind
and degree of intelligence were also involved.
From the outset, it was evident that there was no agreement
between literacy and ability in the form-board test.
Each of the two tests involved a different kind of ability.
In the next place, a follow-up, initiated to find out what
would have been the results if the literacy test had been
used as a basis of selection, showed once more that there
was no consistent agreement between literacy and ability
as a machine operator. In fact, if this test had been used
as a criterion, fully forty per cent of those who later became
good operators would have been eliminated. This,
at a time when labor was very difficult to obtain, would
have been quite disastrous. On the other hand, the formboard
test showed a positive correlation with the subse