THE TECHNIQUE OF GIVING TESTS 163
quick dash like this”—and here he makes a quick, straight
hne, about an eighth of an inch long, in the appropriate
place—“after each number which contains,” etc.
The instance described is only a single, small detail
the process of developing directions for a certain test.
Every set of directions is filled with minute details of
a similar nature. In fact, it is practically impossible to
w °rk out a set of directions which shall be perfect at the
°utset. In developing the directions for the tests which
yere used in the present experiments and which are given,
ln part, in the Appendix, it was the practice to keep a
blank card of directions for each test. This card was
c arried with the test to which it belonged, and whenever a
Mistake or a possible ambiguity in the wording of the
directions was noted, that fact was recorded on this card.
this manner, through a long series of tests and actual
experiences, the best possible set of directions for a particular
test was arrived at. It is safe to say that a set of
directions for any one test can not be made perfect or
fool proof until it has been tried on at least fifty different
subjects. No one, more quickly than the psychologist,
Earns the richness of meaning which even the simplest
' Vy ord contains. No one, therefore, should be better able
t° guard against mistakes arising from this source.
To minimize the mistakes likely to arise from the
ambiguity of words, the psychologist has several courses
°pen to him. One of these has just been illustrated. It
c °nsists of supplementing his words with the action
"'hich he intends the subject to perform. A simple demonoration
like this is often more lucid than a paragraph of
^utds. However, whenever the examiner assumes the
burden of demonstrating his own directions, care must be
taken always to demonstrate according to some standard