THE OBSERVATIONAL METHOD
24I
that a skin of fine texture indicates a mind of fine texture
and consequently an intellectual mind. The scientific
fact advanced to support this view is that the brain is
originally an ingrowth of the skin. This is true. However,
it by no means follows, because the skin of the embryo
turns inward and later develops into the nervous system,
that there is any functional connection between the two.
To say that a fine skin betokens a fine mind is nothing more
than a pretty play upon words.
Scientists are agreed on the fact that there are certain
broad mental functions which are localized in fairly
definite parts of the brain. We know, for instance, that
certain motor areas are located along the fissure of Rolando,
and certain kinsesthetic sensory areas in the same
tegion. Other areas are also generally defined. However,
these areas refer to regions in the brain and not bumps on
the head. Moreover, no scientist has as yet established a
definite relation between specific parts of the brain and
specific mental, moral, and emotional qualities, such as
initiative, will-power, and artistic temperament; and certainly
not between such traits and physical characteristics
as the color of the hair and the position of the eyes. These
facts are entirely in the field of conjecture. If any fact
stands out as prophetic of future developments, it is the
fact that the mind or nervous system is so interwoven
and integrative in its action that definite locations for
definite or rather indefinite personal qualities will never be
found. Sherrington’s work on “ The Integrative Action of
the Nervous System ” is a great contribution toward establishing
this fact. It follows, therefore, that the fundamental
assumption on which the so-called science of
observation rests is an assumption entirely unwarranted
by the facts. (Note. A more complete discussion of this