39 6
APPENDIX
Teachers’ College, are a great convenience for the beginner.
A comprehensive treatment may be found in E. L. Thorndike’s
“Mental and Social Measurements” and a very concise presentation
in Guy M. Whipple’s “Manual of Mental and Physical
Tests ”, Vol. I. The practical psychologist will find that
the slightly greater accuracy of the Pearson formula is more
than compensated for by the greater flexibility and simplicity
of the Spearman formula. It takes about six times longer to
work out the Pearson formula than the Spearman formula
(differences squared). In the treatment of employment tests
it is much more important to obtain a large number of correlations
than to spend time trying to increase the refinement of
a few. Two indices in which there is an inaccuracy of even 5
points have a greater practical significance than one correlation
which is absolutely accurate.
Where groups of more than 20 rankings are to be compared,
the Spearman “footrule” is sufficiently accurate, and extremely
convenient. Extensive use of this formula was made in the
course of the experiments described here. Where “ n” was less
than 20, the longer Spearman formula was used.
Probable errors are not given in connection with the indices
of correlation in the body of the book for two reasons: first,
because they would confuse the ordinary reader; secondly, the
practical psychologist can tell almost at a glance what the
probable error is. Knowing the number of individuals and the
size of the correlation, the P. E. can easily be deduced.
B. GENERAL PROCEDURE
When an individual applies for work, his application is taken
in the employment office and the information placed on a permanent
employment record card. This card is then taken into
the psychological examination room where it serves as an announcement
of the applicant’s readiness to be examined. It
also tells the examiner the kind of work for which the applicant
is asking and gives him certain other essential information.