20
/
discussion to-day. I only mention it because if in any address I
make 1 do not mention economy, I observe it is said that I do not
care about it, and apparently I am not interested in that, and it
is supposed 1 am never turning my attention’ to it, or that the
Government is either. But I come to the other side altogether of
your argument—fund the floating debt. If the public would give
me the money, I will try that way. Beyond that what can I do
to improve credit, or check inflation? I have already stopped
borrowing for any purposes except refunding. There is nothing I
can do but to pay off the debt, and in particular to pay off this
floating debt which is the greatest anxiety to the Exchequer, out of
all proportion to the part which it makes of the national debt; and so
leave the money market in a proper position to serve the interests
of the trade and commerce of the country. But before I can touch
the funding debt I have to take up obligations of longer date to the
tune of something like £160,000,000—o0bligations falling due this
year, though they were obligations entered into for a term of years;
or again, obligations of the Government which are tendered in
payment of Excess Profits Duty, or in payment of Death Duties,
and so forth. In those circumstances, for eighteen months I have sat
in this office, and from the very day I entered it I have been criticised
for not doing enough to reduce the national debt. I could not do
anything to reduce it last year. I did not dare to put a bigger
burden on the country with the conditions to which you and I alike
looked forward at the beginning of last year. This year we have
turned the corner. We have stopped borrowing. Even without
new taxation I had got that £160,000,000; but not a penny really—
an odd 4,000,000 if all my estimates are realised—of that to deal
with the floating debt. So I was obliged to seek further means.
You really set me an insoluble problem when you say reduce
the debt, and at the same time say of every tax that I propose, that
I should do something else. Deputations come to me one after the
other in relation to every tax, each saying the other is all right, but
what you propose for us will really kill us and we cannot stand it.
I do hope you will be a little more optimistic, and take a little more
courage, and that you will not allow yourselves to despond. After
all, whatever may be your opinion of this Budget, the prospects
to-day are better than they looked to us twelve months ago, or at
the time of the last Budget. That I say to you as a preliminary.
I must say to you quite frankly and quite plainly that I cannot at
this stage of the proceedings recast my whole Budget. I am not
here to pretend to you that the Excess Profits Duty is an ideal tax,
or to pretend that 1 have changed in any way my opinion of this
tax. I stated it quite clearly. I admit the tax is open to all the
criticisms that I made, and I daresay to other criticisms made by
other people which I have not made, although my own criticisms
were brief but fairly comprehensive. (Hear, hear.) I admit all
these objections. At any time between the end of the last Budget
and the time when I had made up my mind what was required for
this Budget, and had taken the decisive steps, I would gladly have
considered and tried to work out any reasonable alternative that was
brought to me for getting the same money from the same sources.
But none was. You have largely modified the proposal which the
Federation made to me when they came to see me a little while ago.
A flat rate on profits on Schedule D taxed a great number, not