Full text: A treatise on the law of prize

20 
CHAPTER 11. 
JURISDICTION OF PRIZE COURTS. 
The question § 28. As laid down in the leading case of Le 
Wi a nt (aux v. Eden,* the question * prize or not prize *’ 
eT and the consequences thereof are cognisable solely 
Admiralty in the Admiralty Courts. The jurisdiction of the 
Courts. 4 
Courts of common law is expressly excluded. The 
same principle was affirmed by Dr. Lushington in 
The Elize,? that no other Court whatsoever within 
the United Kingdom, except the High Court of 
Admiralty, was entitled to exercise any jurisdiction 
at all in prize matters. 
Prize is altogether a creature of the Crown,® 
and the right of the Crown consists in seizing and 
bringing to adjudication all enemy ships and all 
goods taken on the high seas jure belli out of the 
hands of the enemy.* This is the definition given 
by Lord Stowell, but it is essential to remember 
that prize jurisdiction is not confined to seizures 
of enemy property on the high seas. The juris- 
diction extends to all maritime captures wherever 
effected,® and to property belonging not only to 
enemies, but also to neutrals and even to British 
; 1 (1781), 2 Dougl. 594, 602 (per Buller, J.), and Tord Mansfield 
in Lindo v. Rodney (1782), ibid., 613, 614. 
2 (1854), Spinks, 88, 97; and Tord Merrivale in The Oranje 
Nassau [1921] 3 B & C. P. C. 915. Cf. The Sommelsdijk, [1925] 
23 Ll. L: R. 119, 120 (C. A.). 
3 The Elsebe (1804), 5 C. Rob. 174, 182. 
4 The Two Friends (1799), 1 ibid., 271, 283. 
5 Key and Hubbard v. Pearse, (1742), (per Lee, C.J.), reported 
in Le Caux v. Eden, supra, at p. 608.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.