s'
rw*'
6
settled by the creditor States, for us they are closely bound together and we
cannot examine their effect on our financial consolidation unless it be together.
It is all the more indispensable to throw o general glance at this moment,
not only because we proceeded by our latest monetary law on an important step-
tor our internal financial consolidation but also because there is on the one
hand a tendency since a few years, in the application of the treaties and
the reparation policy, to create for us a dangerous situation which would com
promise completely the sacrifices and the efforts made by us to this day. (See
the protest of the Roumanian delegation in Spa. Anex 48; the Memoirs men
tioned above of lune 1923 at the London conference 1924, at the conference in
Paris in 1925, Anex. 55 and, 60-and the Memoirs drawn up tor the L. D. N.
of Dec 1924). And on the otlier hand because the question of the Interallied
debts is to day discussed directly by our two principal creditors the United
States of America and England.
Comparing the situation created by the treaties with the one established
by their application we will be able to explain more clearly, on one part our
rights and our obligations, and on the other part our possibility of fulfilling
them, and consequently to determine the attitude of the Roumanian State in
this serious, and I may say, decisive phase of our financial consolidation Therefore
by mutual agreement with the Minister of Foreign Affaiis I thougt it well to
set the stage of these questions at the right point of view, both by publishing
the documents on which our rights and obligations should by founded and by
examining the conclusions that we can draw from all these documents and to
see in what limit we are in the possibility of fulfilling them. The clearer this
question will be, the better "the Roumanian State will know how far it can go
with the concessions which are demanded, without endangering its consoli
dation and I should say its evolution--. And the creditors and other States inte
rested in the reparation policy will bo the better able to judge our attitude and
our demands, and at last the Roumanian public opinion will know all the
better our rights, and will give us its assistance for obtaining them.
In the memoirs which are attached to this report, one on the reparation
policy and the other on the Interallied debts we gave the necessary explana
tions for you to know how these matters have evolved until this day. But we
think that it is well to make a short study of investigation on the general and
special situation of Roumania in this double matter of reparations and Interal
lied debts, in order to be able to interpret this study as completely as possible.
In the first of these two questions the reparations, whatever may be the
manner in which the treaties were drawn up, Roumania, once she had signed
them, had nothing else to do than submit to them. They were treaties of a ge
neral character and they were based on »equality and equity--, which were
to continue the solidarity of the Allies of the great war. But immediately, after
they were drawn up and ratified, the procedure which followed caused a con
tinual infringement of this treatment of equality and equity which was provid
ed and which ought to have been respected in the application of the rights
*
* k
* *
* 4,