THE PROBLEM :
subject adequately it would be necessary to determine the extent to
which migration has dominated the direction and the
amount of industrial growth in the United States—that is, the
extent to which the major changes in our industrial development
and occupational distribution have been closely related to changes
in the volume, type, or geographical distribution of immigration
and emigration.
Even more significant would be an inquiry into the readjustments
which may in the future be set in motion by modifications in the
volume or type of migration. Will a decrease in the annual acces-
sion of laborers from abroad set in motion significant readjustments
in industrial tendencies? Will the vacuum created by restricting
immigration stimulate internal migration of the negro, intensify the
country-to-city movement, or lead to a better utilization of the
available man-power through improvements in methods of or-
ganization and administration or through more effective labor-
saving devices? Or, if none of the above developments is adequate
to enable industries to maintain the customary rate of progress,
must we see a check to industrial advancement? All these are fas-
cinating questions worthy of intensive and sustained research, and
it is hoped that we may in subsequent reports give attention to
these phases of the problem. The present study is made from what
we have designated as the short-time point of view.
Migration and Business Cycles.
The queries we have just suggested are concerned chiefly with
long-run tendencies. Equally significant is the relation of migration
to those fluctuations in industrial activity which mark the various
stages in the business cycle or accompany the round of the seasons.
In recent years the attention of students of economic affairs has
been focused upon the phenomena of the business cycle, with its
alternating periods of prosperity and depression, and the accom-
panying pendulum swing of employment from an apparent shortage
of labor to severe unemployment or a relative surplus of labor. It
is in this undulation of employment conditions that the most obvious
and tangible instances of labor surplus and labor shortage arise.
Demand for labor, like demand for any commodity, means demand
for a given quantity at a given price. Supply means supply at a
given price. Labor shortage and labor surplus, consequently, are
relative terms, to be interpreted in terms of relation to demand at the
prevailing wages. Obviously, however, if due allowance is made for
25