WORK AND WEALTH
merely supplies no safeguard against this abuse of power, but
would almost certainly evoke it, unless a potent control, rep-
resenting industry in general, were established over the indi-
vidual trades or guilds. Experience of cases where local trade-
unions are occasionally placed in a position of tyranny shows
that they will play for their own hand with a disregard to the
interests of their fellow-workers in other trades as callous as is
displayed by any trust of capitalists. Assuming, then, that it
were possible for guild-societies to develop to the point that the
workers in each trade were in possession of all the instruments
of production, and were able to conduct the processes efficiently,
the problem of distributing the ‘surplus’ among the several
trades or guilds, in the shape of pay or leisure, would still re-
main unsolved. Among the groups of producers, in a word, there
would remain divergencies of interest, which would be incapable,
upon a producers’ policy, of solution. Syndicalists, confronted
with this phase of their problem, plunge into vague assurances
that the process of agreement which had taken place between the
workers in the several processes and the several businesses in a
trade, could be extended to the workers grouped in the larger
trade-units, and that the real solidarity of working-class interests
would somehow instinctively express itself in equitable and
durable arrangements. But the moment one passes from the
region of phrases to that of concrete facts the difficulties thicken.
An elected council of national workers would have to devise
some practicable method of comparing units of railway service
with units of mining, bricklaying, doctoring, acting, waiting, etc.,
so as to apply to each productive process the support and stimu-
lus needed to induce the workers engaged in it to do their share
of work and to receive their share of wealth. No mere time
basis for such competition would be practicable. It would be
necessary to induce a body of labour and capital to apply itself
to each process of each occupation, sufficient in quantity and in
efficiency to supply the requirements of the working community
as a whole, and to devise a mode of remuneration, or distribution
of products, which would satisfy this requirement.
It is quite evident that all this adjustment of the claims and
needs of individuals within a process in a business, of businesses
206