LENIN ON ORGANIZATION 
identical delegates whose opportunism, as expressed 
in the proposal to soften down par. 1 as far as it 
regarded the program, was repeatedly admitted by 
the congress, and by Martov and Plekhanov in 
particular. Imagine it, the “continuity of policy” 
of “Iskra” defended by the comedy which begun 
after the congress... 
b) Opportunism in Question of Organization. 
...In order to analyze the fundamental position 
taken up by the new “Iskra” we are obliged to 
examine two articles by Comrade Axelrod. 
Com. Axelrod’s main thesis (“Iskra,” No. 57) is 
that “from the very outset our movement contained 
within itself two contradictory tendencies the mu- 
tual antagonism of which could not but develop 
and react on it as it itself developed.” The two 
contradictory tendencies are summed up as follows: 
“In principle, the proletarian aim of the movement 
(in Russia) is the same as that of the Western 
Social Democrats.” But in our country influence 
is brought to bear on the working class masses “by 
social elements foreign to them”—i. e., the radical 
intellectuals. Thus, Comrade Axelrod records the 
antagonism existing between the proletarian and 
the radical intellectual tendencies in our move- 
ment. 
To that extent Comrade Axelrod is certainly right. 
Of the existence of such antagonism (and not in 
the Russian Social Democratic Party alone) there 
can be no doubt. And not merely so. Everybody 
161