176
MAJORITY REPORT.
rr
400. It is not, we understand, possible to say in what pro-
portions deposit contributors fall into these classes but the first
class is the most numerous. The Ministry of Health informed us
(App. I, A. 100) that ‘* a majority of deposit contributors are in
good health and would have no difficulty in joining a Society.”
We were also informed by the Scottish Board of Health (App. II,
A. 98) that ** an investigation of a sample of deposit contributors
in Scotland disclosed that only 8 per cent. had been refused
admission by Societies and that more than two-thirds had failed to
join Societies by reason of neglect or ignorance.” Contrary to
original expectations, it is clear, therefore, that the class is not
made up almost entirely of ‘‘ bad lives,” and that so far as
health is concerned the majority are eligible for Society member-
ship. The fact that certain Societies have offered to take over
the whole of the deposit contributors and that other Societies
have pressed for allocation of the whole of the deposit contributor
class among Societies, confirms this view.
401. We are informed (Ministry of Health, App. I, A, 97,
Kinnear, Q. 384) that though not engaging in direct propaganda
among deposit contributors, the Department make use of every
reasonable opportunity of impressing on them the desirability in
their own interests of seeking admission to a Society. Thus,
a reasoned explanation and exhortation is given first place in the
leaflet of instructions sent to every deposit contributor; all con-
tribution cards issued at Post Offices have a note on the subject ;
and advice to join a Society is printed on every Record Card
issued to a deposit contributor.
402. It has to be borne in mind that, while the payment
of contributions is compulsory, the further steps to be taken, e.g.,
the choice of an Approved Society and the making of an applica-
tion for membership, call for voluntary action on the part of
the insured person. Not all insured persons are able or willing
to take the necessary steps within any time which may be
officially prescribed, though they may have no objection to the
underlying principle. They become deposit contributors for a
time. but afterwards choose and join Societies.
PoINTS FROM THE EVIDENCE.
403. The evidence which has been placed before us indicates
the difficulty of the problem, and suggests varying solutions.
For example, the Hearts of Oak Benefit Society suggest
(App. IV, 89-107; Q. 2926-3025) the abolition of the class
and compulsory allocation among Societies. The National
Conference of Industrial Assurance Approved Societies (App. VI,
14; Q. 4874-4892, 4908-4909) would abolish the class and allocate
members to Societies with increased reserve values for impaired
lives. They would, however, offer no objection to the institu-
tion of a State Society. The Ancient Order of Foresters