hy
MAJORITY REPORT.
“——
9. The second main cause leading to amendment of the Act
is to be found in the War and its economic consequences. It
1s a striking tribute to the general soundness of the lines on
which the original Act was constructed that its administration
was able to bear the severe strain imposed by war conditions
at so early a date in its history. In relation to National Health
Insurance the War did. not merely occasion great difficulties in
carrying on a scheme largely dependent on voluntary work and
still in its early’ stages, but it raised problems calling for legis-
lation to secure a measure of adaptation to the new conditions
brought about, among many changes, by the absorption of so
large a proportion of the population in the Forces, the grant of
war pensions to disabled men and the general rise in the level
of wages.
THE AMENDING ACTS.
10. Without entering into any detail, it may be convenient to
refer briefly to some of the more important amending Acts
passed during the period under review. The earliest Act was
that of 1913, the immediate object of which was to make pro-
vision by Exchequer grant for the additional cost of medical
benefit. At the same time, the opportunity was taken to give
effect to a certain number of minor amendments the need for
which had been disclosed in the early period of the operation
of the Act. In 1915 and 1917 two Acts were passed in order
to effect an adjustment in the rate of benefit payable to discharged
soldiers in receipt of total disability pensions. Much more
important was the Act of 1918, which followed the Report of the
Departmental Committee on Approved Society Finance and
Administration. The okject of this Act was primarily to give
effect to certain financial adjustments in the Scheme designed
to strengthen the position of the weaker Societies ; but it also
introduced a large measure of simplification in regard to a con-
siderable number of administrative details. Of later measures
two, passed in 1919 and 1920, were occasioned by changing
economic conditions, the first raising the limit for insurance of
non-manual workers from a rate of remuneration of £160 to
£250 a year, and the second increasing the rates of contributions
and of benefits. Apart from these, it is only necessary
to refer generally to the Acts dealing with the cost of medical
benefit and to mention as of special interest the Act
which made provision for prolongation of insurance in certain
cases in order to meet the hardship occasioned by the general
prevalence of unemployment. It was inevitable that this con-
siderable volume of uncoordinated legislation should add not a
little to the difficulties of administration and it was of material
advantage to all concerned when in 1924 the whole of the
existing legislation relating to National Health Insurance (with
the exception of certain temporary provisions) was consolidated