RELATION OF SEX DISTRIBUTION TO INTERMARRIAGE 127
men intermarrying and a surplus of 370 p.c. adult males, furnish a second illustration.
Other similar cases are the Bulgarians, Japanese, Serbo-Croatians and Italians All of those
peoples are characterized by large surpluses of males. Generally speaking, where the
surplus of males is great, the proportion of males intermarrying is large as compared with the
proportion for the women. Conversely, where the inequality in the numbers is not marked,
the proportions of men and women marrying outside the group usually tend to be more
nearly equal.
But there appears to be yet another factor involved, quite apart from differences in
the relative numbers of the sexes. If one selects the 7 non-British and non-French peoples
with the smallest surpluses of males 21 years and over in Canada, they are found to be
the following: Icelandic, Indian, Hebrew, Dutch, German, Negro and Hungarian; the Ice-
landers with only 2 p.c. surplus males being the lowest, and the others mentioned in ascend-
ing order. Now in 5 out of those 7 cases, larger proportions of the women have contracted
exogamous marriages than of the men. This points to the conclusion that when sex
inequalities are eliminated women are less conservative than men in crossing the line in
marriage.
However, before dwelling on that point, the two exceptions should be dealt with, viz.
the Jews and the Dutch. The first case, that of the Jews, is readily explained by the rigid
attitude of the Jews with regard to intermarriage acting as a greater deterrent to a daughter
contemplating an exogamous marriage than to a son. While other factors may be involved,
it is probable that the one mentioned is the most important. At least it seems adequate
to explain the situation.
With the Dutch the explanation is more difficult. The pecularity may be a distinct
characteristic of the group in respect to marriage preferences, but other factors are involved
in terms of which at least a plausible explanation may be found. The Dutch in the eastern
provinces are, as a group, the oldest non-British and non-French residents in Canada, and
they show the largest proportions marrying with the British. Indeed in the East the Dutch
have already intermarried with the British to so great an extent that they are almost
indistinguishable from those appearing on the census records as of British stock. Conse-
quently, it tends to be a matter of indifference to one of Dutch origin in Ontario whether
he marries a wife of British or Dutch stock. The same tends to obtain with the women.
Since there is no barrier in the case of either sex, no occasion arises for the women to
appear less conservative than the men in crossing the line. Further, that the men appear
to intermarry to a greater extent, can be explained by the fact that men move about and
meet more people than do the women. In the West the situation as to barriers to inter-
marriage is entirely different. The majority of those classified as Dutch in the three
prairie provinces in 1921 are Mennonites, who have intermarried to no great extent with the
British or French nor indeed with any other stock in Canada. They live in more or less
isolated communities and are entirely agricultural people. The women rarely leave the
farms or villages, but the men are able to move about the country, and although they do
not congregate in the cities in the West, the young men are seen very frequently in the
towns and villages adjacent to their communities. So with the Mennonites also one would
not be surprised to find the men, because of the opportunity of meeting people of other
origins, marrying outside their group to a greater extent than the women.
Having disposed of the two exceptions, one again puts forward the suggestion and with
greater confidence, that the tendency among women of most stocks other than British and
French to marry outside their respective groups is greater than that among the men. If
further research establishes the existence of such a tendency, it may prove to be the result
of a true sex difference or it may bez largely a matter of residence. In Chapter V it was
shown that in the case of immigrants from virtually every foreign country, larger percent-
ages of females than males live in urban districts. Urban life is more cosmopolitan, and
with large proportions of women of a given origin living in incorporated cities, towns and
villages, it is natural to expect, other things being equal, that they would show a large pro-
portion marrying into other stocks. Thus, in examining Table 70 both the difference in