MAJORITY REPORT.
51
wk Sense
recommends medical unification of the services. ‘‘ Provision in
connexion with maternity and infant welfare *’ should be raade
‘‘ an integral part of the Insurance Scheme or brought into proper
relation thereto >’ (App. XL/VII 19-20). In paragraph 29 of the
same Appendix they point out that ‘‘ attendance in connexion
with confinement is expressly excluded from medical benefit,
and such public provision as insured women and the wives of
insured men can avail themselves of is under other auspices
and is not complete in character.” They recommend that in
addition to a cash payment there should be suitable ante-natal
examination and supervision, attendance at confinement and
during the puerperal period by a midwife or doctor as the case
requires, consultant and specialist service available for difficult
cases, provision for institutional treatment where necessary
(App. XLVII, 29, 30; Q. 15,118-15,129).
106. The Society of Medical Officers of Health who, &s
representing the medical advisers of the bodies responsible for
the work of the Maternity and Child Welfare Centres, speak with
special authority in this matter, say that *‘ the maternity and
child welfare schemes have involved local authorities in large
expenditure frequently greatly exceeding the total amount of
maternity benefit paid in their district.” They point out that
‘““ These schemes are of the same essential nature as maternity
benefit and the only practical method by which this latter benefit
can be administered in the interests of the mother and child
is by requiring local authorities to administer it through their
statutory Maternity and Child Welfare Committees.” After
reciting the need for the same elements of medical attention as
those recommended by the British Medical Association they go
on to say that ‘‘ maternity benefit even in money value should
vary according to the necessity of the mother and the medical
character of the case ’’ (App. LVI, 9). They conclude with the
following recommendations :—
‘“ Maternity benefit, whether in its present, or in an
extended form, should cease to be administered by Approved
Societies and be administered both in money and kind by
local authorities; which, in their turn, should be made
definitely responsible for providing medical attention. The
attendance upon maternity cases should not be an obligation
upon a panel practitioner.” (App. LVI, 14 (10) ; Q. 16,992.)
‘“ Maternity benefit should provide for all necessary
medical attendance in pregnancy and maternity, and
medical benefit should be understood to be exclusive of such
medical attendance.”” (App. LVI, 14 (11).)
107. Very interesting evidence on this subject was given by the
late Mr. Benjamin Broadbent, who devoted so much of his life
to the furtherance of public health work, especially in its bearing
on the welfare of mothers and children. He regarded the