ELASTICITY OF SUPPLY AS A DETERMINANT OF DISTRIBUTION 115
divergent rates of change in the total product which follow an
alteration in the physical quantity of the factors, may be so
equated as to be reduced to a common function. How, in other
words, can the production of potatoes, copper ore, loaves of
bread, and neckties be reduced to common units in which we have
different technical coefficients of production? This, however, can
be effected by computing index numbers of production in which
the quantities of each product, weighted by their values, are
reduced to relatives. If the change is to be studied over a
period of time, this general index of production, similar to those
constructed by the Federal Reserve Board and the Harvard Com-
mittee on Economic Research, will measure sufficiently well what
we desire. And if it be objected that the relative values will
change from year to year and that consequently an index based
on fixed weights will be wrong, it can be shown that Professor
Irving Fisher has eliminated this difficulty in his “ideal” index
number where he commends the use of the geometrical average of
the index of a commodity in a given year weighted by its
value in the base year multipled by the index for the given year
weighted by the values of the given year.
In this way a satisfactory physical index of general production
can be secured to measure the physical effects of altered quantities
of the factors. Within these physical outputs, of course, produec-
tivity will be measured in terms of value, but for the society as
a whole we can measure fairly accurately the productivity as a
whole. Even here, however, there will be difficulties in taking into
account (1) the relative degree of fabrication in manufacturing
at different intervals, and (2) the relative amount of services
supplied at differing periods.
3. The relative amount of labor, capital and imputed services
of natural resources which are contained in the commodities upon
which laborers expend their wages as compared with the relative
quantities of these factors which are consumed by the recipients
of interest and of rent, also affects the final apportionment,
of the product to the factors of production. It is important
therefore, to trace the effects of consumption as well as of pro-
* See Fisher, The Making of Index Numbers (1st edition), p. 482.
The formula is:
V Zqipe Zqip,
— ¥ s———
Sqpe ZqQop: