105
and farmers working on their own account, was £205. These
averages are not comparable with those for 1908 as given in the
Census of Production Report of that year. On that occasion all
the occupiers of agricultural holdings were taken into account,
and, in addition, it would appear that the number of workers
was somewhat overstated.
Number of workers employed in relation to size of holdings.—
The fact that the number of workers employed is returned on
the Agricultural Schedule with the area of the holding has
enabled an analysis to be made which shows approximately the
proportionate extent to which the different sized holdings provide
employment.
NUMBER OF AGRICULTURAL WORKERS IN ENGLAND AND WALES
PER 1,000 ACRES OF CROPS AND GRASS, ACCORDING TO SIZE
AND Type or Honping, IN 1924.
All Holdings
(excluding fruit,
vegetable and
souliry holdings). |
i— 5 acres
o— 20 ,,
20- 50 ,,
50-100 ,,
100-150 ,,
150-300 ,,
200-500 ,
Over 500 ,,
Total -
Fruit and vege-
table holdings
Poultry holdings
Regular Workers.
Casual Workers.
Males
21
and
OVer.
Males ' Women
under and
a oirls.
Males
21
and
over.
Males
under
21.
Total
Women| workers.
and
airls.
20-0
14-9
m7
14-4
15-0 |
16-1
18-1
19.9
6-7
5-4
6-0
5-9
5-3
4-7
1.4
1-5
3-4
3-4
3-2 |
3.1
25 |
1.8
1.8
1-0
8-9
5-7
4-8 |
4-0!
3:3
2-6
1-9
14
2-7
1-9
1-6
1-2
-9
27
5
4
1-6 |
1-5
1-5
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-2
1-0
B
43-3
32-8
30-8
29-9
28-3
27-2
27-4
27-5
16-0 |
5-1
aq ia, p
-9
1:3
28:6
87-2
48-4
24-2 | 15-1 |
290.8 1 9.1
218
16-0
8-4 | 37-2
Go0- 1 ain
| 193-7
112-3
The high rate of employment upon holdings of 1 to 5 acres,
nd to a less extent upon holdings of 5 to 20 acres, is probably
due in part to the fact that these small occupations include a
proportion of holdings where the occupier prefers to engage
sutside labour rather than work on the land himself, and in
many cases the workers may not be employed for their full time
on work connected with the agricultural holding. In fact, owing
to the miscellaneous character of the plots and pieces of land
ncluded in the group between 1 and 5 acres the figures have not
much significance.
An examination of the returns shows that the labour employed
is oreater on holdings which are mainly arable than on mixed