148
‘INTERNATIONAL TRADE
in
ivnd
arguments for protection untenable, nay intellectually repellent,
and those for international codperation and concord strong and
appealing, there remains no inclination to commend this particular
method of trying to capture a greater share of the total gain from
trade between nations.
As a dry matter of analysis, however, it is to be said that, in this
matter of import duties and the barter terms of trade, the position
of the United States was long a comparatively advantageous one.
The country’s exports were chiefly foodstuffs and raw materials.
Raw cotton bulked large among them ; an article so much wanted
by other countries that they never impose duties onit. Foodstuffs,
again, were never subjected to duties by Great Britain, to which
they went so largely; and the duties put on them by the countries
of the Continent did not seriously check the imports that way.
The countries to which the American exports mainly went were
thus unwilling or unable to play the game of retaliation with much
prospect of success. The protective duties imposed by the United
States, however, did have the effect of checking some imports
heavily and of stimulating domestic production to a corresponding
extent; while yet other imports continued to come in. These
other imports were in part goods of the protected class which came
in over the barrier of the duties, such as wool, sugar, and sundry
manufactured goods. In much larger part they were tropical or
semi-tropical goods which were admitted free. It was the latter
which came to predominate more and more largely in the import
trade of the United States. As regards these, the barter terms of
trade quite possibly become more advantageous, without any such
offset as must be reckoned in respect of the protected goods.
So much as regards the general reasoning and some possibilities
of its application. What bearing it may conceivably have on the
actual course of the international trade of the United States will
be considered in another connection.!
1 See below, Ch. 24, pp. 299-306.