Our Industrial Problems.
lustrial community in the world is doing
o-day, and must do increasingly as the
supply of new markets gives out and the
echnique of production becomes more and
nore marvellously efficient. = The dispro-
hortion between the limits of production
nd the Yimits of consumption is the chief
source of international war and of domes-
tie strife, 1t is not perhaps desirable that
we should produce less. What is not only
lesirable but imperative is that what is
produced should be consumed. And this
Sannot be done without a drastic readjust-
nent in the technique of distribution,
which is one of those corollaries of which
xe have spoken as being rendered inevi-
sable by the mechanical. revolution. Pro
luction and distribution are like inspirae
sion and respiration. In a healthy. organ-
sm there is a correspondence and equivas
lence between the two. Our vital prob-
‘em is not how to produce, but how to
1istribute our products.
More Money.
They are distributed to buyers. But a
reference to statistics which need not be
juoted here will show that no mannfac-
uring community in the world can afford
:0 buy what it produces! This is the ano-
maly which is the main cause of the
world’s present industrial and economic
troubles. We cannot afford to buy all,
sr anything like all, ofthe things we pro-
juce. Crudely put, therefore, what we
all need, in order that the equivalence be-
tween production and consumption may be
healthily maintained, is simply greater
yurchasing power, in other words, more
money. And this apparently farcical con-
slugion is a plain statement of a faet
which in its consequences is by no means
farcical, but tragic.
Well then, it may be said, we have
merely gone a long way round to arrive
16 the familiar ery of the wage earner, for
nore wages. By no means. For there is
‘his important difference that we recog:
prise that any increase in wages or salary
is not to come, and eannot come, from
2 raid on profits. And this again is a mere
matter of figures. The profits which look
so large in the aggregate wonld not, if
every penny of them were added to wages,
make mueh of a showing when divided
among tens of thousands of claimants.
This is the element of truth in the popu:
jar refutation of Socialism as a scheme
for “dividing np.’ We are asking for no
such thing. We are asking not for an
increase in wages or salaries. but for an
increase in money. But. it will be asked.
if it is more money we need, and if thers
97
srying for the moon? The problem re-
is” no more money available, why go on
mains unsolved and insoluble, and the ef-
forts of wage-earners to improve their pe-
cuniary position will continue to be a pros
cess like that of the cat chasing her tail
~—the tail being the rise in the cost of
goods (or fall in the .value of money)
which at: present antomatically accompane
tes every rise in wages.
The Basis of Credit.
But this despairing conclusion is based
spon a fallacious assumption. The as
sumption is that the supply of money is
a fixed quantity. Our discussion has now
brought us to the edge of that “dark
wood” of financial theory from which
most of us are scaréd away by a sense of
4s mystery and incomprehensibility. Once
again brevity compels us to dogmatise:
We must be allowed to deny the mystery.
For our purpose it is suflicient to say that
the amount of money in the world at &
given time is not fixed by any iron law
of nature. As much movey can be made
yut of paper as anybody likes who has
‘he power to make and circulate it. it
Joes not follow that this power ig always
axercised wisely or socially. In any come
nunity there must be maintained a ratio
between goods and money (or credit). In
a perfect community the ratio would be
one of exact equality. The money (or
credit) would buy the goods, But this per-
fect ratio may be disturbed in either of
two ways. There may be too much money
in circulation, or too little. The couten-
tion of this essay is that our present in-
dustrial troubles arise mainly from the
lact that the ratio has been disturbed in
the second of these two wags. There is
pot enough money in circulation to buy
the goods which are produced. The solu-
tion of our problem lies in such a reform
of our -credit system as will remove this
anomaly. The control of eredit is the cou-
trol of the world. That control must be
resumed by the community, and directed
to its proper end—the maintenance of
stability with justice in. our industrial
world.
We have redched the limit of the space
lowed us. It is impossible to carry the
discussion further or enter on details. We
are content to have indicated the diree-
ion which must be taken in the search
for industrial peace. The point at which
industry needs attention is the point net
of production but of distribution. Our
evils arise from maldistribution, which in
its turn has its source in a system of
sredit which is radically anti-soeial.
The Complete Home Paper is “The Western Mail.”"