Full text: Russian local government during the war and the Union of Zemstvos

B2 THE ZEMSTVOS DURING THE WAR 
tions.* With the cooperative societies the zemstvos established very 
close contact both in Moscow and all over the country, working hand 
in hand wherever the opportunity presented itself. 
There was a scarcity of suitable persons to direct local work and 
this was one of the main obstacles to the development of the under- 
takings of the zemstvos. Service with the army, both voluntary and 
compulsory, proved a severe drain on the supply of energetic and 
intelligent workers, of whom there had always been too few in the 
Russian villages. This is why the zemstvos were sometimes com- 
pelled to abandon the very idea of establishing their own organs 
within the districts. Whenever it was possible, they utilized the serv- 
ices of the volost committee for the relief of families of mobilized 
men. But the difficulty was that in many localities relations between 
the zemstvo and the government officials were not sufficiently cordial 
to permit proper coSperation. 
The number of volost and village committees varied greatly in 
the different sections of the country. Moreover, all these organs were 
somewhat unstable; they would come into existence only to disap- 
pear again shortly; and, besides, there had never been anything like 
a proper enumeration or registration of them. We are, however, 
able to furnish data obtained by an inquiry made on June 25, 1916, 
in fifty-two districts. In forty-nine of these there were found volost 
committees created under the law of June 25, 1912. In fifteen dis- 
tricts no other organizations of this kind were found and the zem- 
stvos were compelled to operate with their assistance. In ten dis- 
tricts there existed, apart from the committees mentioned above, only 
the parish committees, and it was only in two districts that the 
zemstvos succeeded in utilizing the cooperation of these agencies. 
Three districts had nothing but zemstvo institutions. For the 
twenty-four districts which had both kinds of organizations, the in- 
quiry furnished complete and detailed figures. There were 576 com- 
mittees of relief established under the law of June 25, 1912, making 
an average of twenty-four per district. 
As long as the work was of a charitable character, it was possible 
to carry it on with this motley organization. But when it became a 
matter of stemming the decline of agriculture and fighting the high 
* See Kayden and Antsiferov, The Cobperative Movement in Russia dur- 
ing the War (Yale University Press, 1929) in this series of the Economic 
and Social History of the World War.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.