COSTS OF PRODUCTION AND RETURNS TO GROWERS
IDAHO, BY AREAS
TABLE 11.—Weighted average costs of production and returns to growers from the
sale of sugar beets
SUMMARY FOR IDAHO AND ANALYSIS BY AREAS, 1921, 1922, AND 1923
Area and year
Average costs 1
No allow-
ince made
for land
rental and
‘nterest on
other
capital
smployed
in sugar-
beet
nroduction
Allowance
made for
ash rental
on land
wud inter-
estat6
Jer cent on
other
capital
mployed
in sugar-
beet
production
Average
eturns to
growers
rom the
sale of
sugar
beets
Amount by which the
feturns to growers
irom the sale of sugar
beets exceed the
costs of production
of sugar beets
No alow-
ance made
for land
rental
wind inter-
est on
other
capital
‘mployed
in sugar-
beet
production
Allowance
made for
and rental
and inter-
est at 6
per cent
»n other
capital
mployed
in sugar-
beet
croduction
PER ACRE OF SUGAR BEETS HARVESTED
[daho:?
3-Vear average . owe ocean.
1921.
192".
F923... cue
Twin Falls—
3-Vear average ...ooo ooo...
1921... ERE
1922.
1923
Blackfoot:
3-year average.... _..____._...
0 im meee. i ae
BD ER ere mem on
or
381. 73
7¢ 08
19, 57
cr 47
31. 20
'8 44
0. 21
“7 Q4
31. 51
9.77
79. .1
$5. 86
$97 0
97
95.
09 bh
JE.
96
IE
LS
98. I
Ie
95.
100) 1%
$106. 00
70.26
122.70
130. 76
16. 52
72.06
137. 93
29.69
01. 58
69. 06
112.19
192 48
b24. 27
-8.£2
43.13
45. 29
35 32
-6 38
57.72
54.75
20.07
10. 51
33.08
37.62
$8.10
-27. 28
26. 97
31.30
19.65
~24. 22
42.00
41, 21
3.48
—29. 42
16. 53
23. 30
"ER TON OF SUGAR RERTS HARVESTED
[daho:
3-year average... _..._._..__.._.
1921. ___.
1922 _ ..___.
1923 ____.
Twin Falls—
3-year average._.
1921.
922. __.
1923. _.
Blackfoot—
°-= agar average
rm.
J. 91
ne
Top
31. 72
93
4
#
$0. 56
—2.31
1.84
2.03
1.32
-2.02
2.51
2.59
27
. 55
1.23
1 AR
1 See pp. 8 to 14 for a discussion of methods of determining costs
' Average of the two Idaho areas investigated.
NOTE.—A minus sign(—) preceding a fizure indicates that costs exceed returns by the amount shown
