COSTS OF PRODUCTION AND RETURNS TO GROWERS
IDAHO, BY AREAS

TABLE 11.—Weighted average costs of production and returns to growers from the
sale of sugar beets
SUMMARY FOR IDAHO AND ANALYSIS BY AREAS, 1921, 1922, AND 1923

Area and year

Average costs 1

No allowince
 made
for land
rental and
‘nterest on
other
capital
smployed
in sugarbeet

nroduction

Allowance
made for
ash rental
on land
wud interestat6

Jer cent on
other
capital
mployed
in sugarbeet

production

Average
eturns to
growers
rom the
sale of
sugar
beets

Amount by which the
feturns to growers
irom the sale of sugar
beets exceed the
costs of production
of sugar beets

No alowance
 made
for land
rental
wind interest
 on
other
capital
‘mployed
in sugarbeet

production

Allowance
made for
and rental
and interest
 at 6
per cent
»n other
capital
mployed
in sugarbeet

croduction

PER ACRE OF SUGAR BEETS HARVESTED

[daho:?
3-Vear average . owe ocean.
1921.
192".
F923... cue
Twin Falls—
3-Vear average ...ooo ooo...
1921... ERE
1922.
1923
Blackfoot:
3-year average.... _..____._...
0 im meee. i ae
BD ER ere mem on
or

381. 73
7¢ 08
19, 57
cr 47

31. 20
'8 44
0. 21
“7 Q4

31. 51
9.77
79. .1
$5. 86

$97 0
97
95.
09 bh

JE.
96
IE
LS

98. I
Ie
95.
100) 1%

$106. 00
70.26
122.70
130. 76

16. 52
72.06
137. 93
29.69

01. 58
69. 06
112.19
192 48

b24. 27
-8.£2
43.13
45. 29

35 32
-6 38
57.72
54.75

20.07
10. 51
33.08
37.62

$8.10
-27. 28
26. 97
31.30

19.65
~24. 22
42.00
41, 21

3.48
—29. 42
16. 53
23. 30

"ER TON OF SUGAR RERTS HARVESTED

[daho:
3-year average... _..._._..__.._.
1921. ___.
1922 _ ..___.
1923 ____.
Twin Falls—
3-year average._.
1921.
922. __.
1923. _.
Blackfoot—
°-= agar average

rm.

J. 91

ne

Top

31. 72

93
4

#

$0. 56
—2.31
1.84
2.03

1.32
-2.02
2.51
2.59

27
. 55
1.23
1 AR

1 See pp. 8 to 14 for a discussion of methods of determining costs
' Average of the two Idaho areas investigated.

NOTE.—A minus sign(—) preceding a fizure indicates that costs exceed returns by the amount shown