Full text: Idaho

CUMULATION, AT INCREASING COSTS OF PRODUCTION 
PER TON OF SUGAR BEETS, OF PRODUCING FARMS, 
AND OF ACRES AND TONS OF SUGAR BEETS HARVESTED, 
1922 
TaBLE 16.—Cumulation, al increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, 
of producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested 
IJNITED STATES, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR THE 22 AREAS 
INVESTIGATED 
[Excluding capital charges] 
Cost per ton - - 
Number | Per cent 
Farms 
Acres 
Tons 
Number Per cent 
Number | Per cent 
Less than— 
BBO iia RRR 
I ee ce SG 0 BR Bm RES 
Deeee ame mmm —————— 
Vemma = erm ———— 
Vo eee 
1 FO  - 
ees CITT ’ TT 
$10.0 .. 
$10. oo... 
$11.0. caer r— 
$11.59 _.... me IR 2 
$12.0 ccemaae —— ie 
$12.50 ecommerce meee 
$13.00 coal emma m—————— 
$13. _.. e mmmmmmmmme————— 
M14 eam mm em m————————— 
b14, cw mmm m——— 
BE... RRR 
A5 LL. rs mm mm SS 
36... mmm mmm mm ———- 
M7 nes [ES 
30 
128 
298 
553 
803 
, 082 
., 297 
, 491 
655 
L797 °° 
, 801 
., 966 
019 
065 
100 
11¢ 
"we 
£1 
i351 
171 
183 
190 
198 
205 
210 
218 
219 
223 
226 
28 
“30 
31 
hed 
0.2 
1.3 
5.7 
13.3 
24.7 
35.8 
18.3 
57.9 
66. 6 
73.9 
80.2 
R4. 4 
%7.8 
0.1 
72.2 
2.8 
‘6 
956. £ 
I | 
26. 
94. ¢ 
ot 
269.6 
1,418. 5 
1,494. 2 
9,765. 6 
17,140. 1 
23, 476. 8 
30,118. & 
35,195. € 
30, 111. ! 
42,243. 7 
45, 064. 1 
46, 999. 7 
48,424, © 
49, 544. { 
50, 144. § 
’ 095. ¢ 
1,679.9 
2,066. 9 
351.9 
52, 849, 9 
=~ 069. 9 
53, 186. 6 
R19, 
OLE 
7.1 
5,1 
0.6 
2.6 
8.2 
17.8 
31.2 
12° 
4,664. & 
24,194. 1 
72,107. 2 
149, 532. 5 
247, 646. 7 
328, 257. 2 
405, £71. € 
30, 254. € 
31, 039. 4 
32,127. ¢ 
57,692. ¢ 
74, 255. & 
*36, 582. 1 
Eo0p ¢ 
0,733.1 
4,440.1 
‘N741.4 
“92. 
i218 
..7,784. 5 
7:2 935. EF 
“19,745. 9 
246.0 
ig 
oy} 
70. ¢ 
37.% 
OL 7 
916.7 
277 496. ¢ 
652. ! 
=.0.- 
Te 
0.7 
3.8 
1L5 
23.8 
39.5 
52.4 
64.6 
73.4 
79.9 
84.9 
20.0 
9.6 
*.6 
on 
- 
= 
A 
- 
¢ 
: 
y 
b 
30 
Te 
8% 4 
gg 4 
99, 
99, © 
99.2 
99.9 
99.9 
99.9 
99.9 
99.9 
99.9 
100. 0 
c 
00 ¢ 
236 99, . 
» 240 | 100.0 
at 
sy, al 
9c R071 
Nor 
total; .1v 
he data for 2 farms were excl: ~°d from thie table because the sugar-’ ‘et crop on hoth was a
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.