NATIONAL ORIGINS PROVISION OF IMMIGRATION LAW 155
Quotas of Germany, the Irish Free State, and Great Britain, plus Northern
Ireland
1890
quotas
National
origins
quotas
FOrmany - ove cvaecauna: ee mmmmmeeemmemmmmmmamemmaemmme Sm mmmeem mm
[7iSh Free State ooo eoarom—romemememsamwes: -oscemmsemeees. smmssasmssssnmees
JFreat Britain and northern IrelaBd. oc cmumeem commas conan er ———]
31, 227
28, 567
34, 007 |
24, 906
17,427
85, 894
Assuming that the revised report of the national origins figures
is substantially correct, as I believe it is, the 1890 quotas effect a 100
per cent discrimination in favor of the element in our population
derived from Germany and the Irish Free State and a discrimination
of 94 per cent against that part of our people which is derived from
England, Scotland, Wales, and North Ireland. How does this work
out over a period of 10 years?
; In 10 years we should get, approximately, on the 1890 foreign-born
asls
HT IE ATES eee oe rm om bn
[rich Free State Rei im ee
510, 000
280, 000
TOA eee mmm mmm meee. (90, 000
English, Scotch, Welsh, and North Irisho eo 340, 000
Thus there would come into the country in the period named
£50,000 more Germans and Irish than immigrants from Great Britain
and North Ireland. This excess, moreover, as already pointed out,
would represent further dilution of the Anglo-Saxon element in our
population. It would not be a square deal to all elements as is the
case with the national origins plan. Is this just to ourselves as a
nation, or is it advisable? The late Maj. Gen. Leonard Wood summed
up the melting-pot problem clearly and briefly when he said, “ The
American cement has about all the sand it will stand.”
The late Gino Speranza, an American citizen of Italian parentage,
in his great book, Race or Nation, had for his main thesis that our
American institutions and our American civilization itself were in
danger if we continued to allow mass immigration of other races
eradually to submerge the racial element which produced those insti-
ations and civilization, He holds that, to a large extent, forms of
government as well as social customs and ideals are the products of
race, and that the best guardian of a nation’s institutions is the race
ny which they were involved.
By keeping our basic stock proportionately represented in the
quotas we tend to avert the danger pointed out by Speranza. In
this connection the quotation from Gustave Le Bon in Professor
Garis’ article, We Must be on Guard (Saturday Evening Post,
January 5, 1929), is appropriate:
A preponderating influence of foreigners is a sure solvent of the existence of
States. It takes away from a people its most precious possession—its soul,
I believe that there are many evidences that our body politic is
suffering to-day from too much alienage. Says Speranza, on this
point: