CONFERENCE BOARD INDEX 57
articles in 51 cities, is used in the Conference Board’s index.
By linking these to the index for 22 items secured prior to 1921,
which, in turn, had increased from 15 articles in 1913, a
continuous series by months is available since 1913. This
was not changed originally to a July, 1914 base when the
National Industrial Conference Board index number of the
total cost of living was constructed on less precise data than
at present, and has never been changed since. This is
because it was felt that for food, perhaps, more than for any
other major item in the total cost of living, seasonal fluctua-
tions in price occurred and that, prices being somewhat
higher in July than a normal average for the year,! the
latter furnished a better basis for measuring changes over a
considerable period of time. Had the retail food price
series been converted to a July, 1914, base, the greatest
difference would have been found at the peak in July, 1920,
and there would have been shown an increase of 114.79 for
food prices over July, 1914, as contrasted with 1199, over
the average for the year 1913, which is the figure used.
In the total cost of living this would have made an increase
since July, 1914, of 102.3%; instead of the regular figure,
104.5%. These retail food prices are collected by mail each
month and the Bureau of Labor Statistics furnishes the
National Industrial Conference Board with the current
index number as soon as it is completed.?
The Total Cost of Living
After the percentages of change in the cost of the large
aumber of goods and services listed in the preceding pages
have been ascertained, and have been combined so as to
show the change in the cost of the five major items since
July, 1914, these are combined to show the change in the
budget as a whole. As previously noted, different items
have a different importance. It is, therefore, necessary to
give the index number for each item its corresponding im-
portance or weight in the budget as a whole, by multiplying
! Prices in July, 1914 were the same as the average for 1914, but 2% higher than
che average for the year 1913.
2 See pp. 69-72; 77-79, of this volume for description of the method of collect-
ng and combining current food prices.