82 THE AGRARIAN SYSTEM OF MOSLEM INDIA
furnishes some details which are wanting in the parallel
passages in the Ain; and reference will be made further on
to a case in which the former seems deliberately to supply
the text of official documents which had been omitted from
the latter. We must then read the two together as com-
plementary; neither tells us all we want to know, but
nearly all is contained in one or other; and in the case of
some gaps, at least, we may suspect that the editing was at
fault. In the description which follows, I begin with the
history of the heart of the Empire, from the Punjab to
Allahabad, tracing first the assessments, then the Assign-
ments, and then the course of certain scandals which
supervened: I then examine the working of the Regulation-
system in its final form; and conclude with a survey of the
arrangements in force throughout the Empire in the latter
portion of the reign.
2. THE METHODS OF ASSESSMENT
This section relates mainly to the country which, from
the 24th regnal years onwards, was included in the five
provinces of Lahore, Delhi, Agra, Awadh,! and Allahabad.
A sixth province, Multan, comes into the story in the 15th
year, and a seventh, Malwa, also appears in the records
but the figures relating to it are so eccentric as to suggest
that in practice it must have had an assessment system
of its own. Put very briefly, the story which has to be told
is one of three sets of assessment-rates, which may be called
respectively ‘‘Sher Shah’s,” ‘the ganiingo,” and “the
ten-year”; all three come under the general type which I
have described as Measurement, that is to say, a charge,
varying with the crop, on the area sown; and the transition
from one set of rates to another represents a gradual ap-
proximation to a workable system.
As has been indicated in the last chapter, Akbar, or
rather, the Regent, Bairam Khan, began by adopting for
general use a schedule of assessment-rates which had been
framed by Sher Shah? on the basis ot claiming for the State
17 retain the spelling Awadh as a tacit reminder that Akbar’s province
differed materially in extent from the country now known as Oudh.
2 Ain, i. 297, 347. The passages bearing on this section are discussed
a. Appendix E.