Full text: The agrarian system of Moslem India

166 THE AGRARIAN SYSTEM OF MOSLEM INDIA 
probably be a mistake to regard all the Brotherhoods as 
dating from the same period. The institution is undoubtedly 
very old, but, in the course of its long existence, many 
particular Brotherhoods may have disappeared, and many 
others mav have emerged. 
From what has been said already, it will be apparent 
that at this period there was considerable diversity of con- 
ditions in the villages of Northern India. The main types 
may be described as follows. First, there was the derelict 
village (wirdn), that is to say, an area recognised as a village, 
but uninhabited and uncultivated, presumably because the 
peasants had been driven, or induced, to abandon it. Next, 
there was the village without a resident population, culti- 
vated by inhabitants of other villages. These two classes 
were, so far as can be judged, of minor importance, and the 
bulk of the villages may be divided into those with a 
Brotherhood and those without. 
The Brotherhood villages may be classed as “pure” 
or “mixed,” the distinction turning on the presence of 
resident peasants outside the Brotherhood. The pure type 
was characteristic of that part of Bundelkhand which had 
come under British rule: in it, all the resident peasants 
were members of the Brotherhood, and, while individual 
members might cultivate land in another village as well 
as in their own, the resident peasant outside the Brotherhood 
was practically unknown. In the eyes of the early British 
administrators, this fact served to differentiate Bundelkhand 
from the country North of the Jumna, in which the mixed 
type prevailed, if it was not universal. As a matter of fact, 
in studying the Records, I have come across scarcely a 
single village in the Doab or Rohilkhand in which cultiva- 
tion was carried on only by the Brotherhood and the 
village servants, though I have found cases where the area 
held by other peasants was proportionately very small; 
ordinarily the peasants outside the Brotherhood were an 
important, if sometimes a subordinate, factor in agricul- 
tural production. 
The villages without a Brotherhood fall into two groups. 
In the first come the somewhat numerous cases of what
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.