Appendix D.
ASSESSMENT BY NASAQ.
IN the text I have followed generally the description of Akbar’s
methods of assessment which was offered in a paper written some
years ago in collaboration with Mr. Yusuf Ali (J.R.A.S., 1918,
pp. 8 ff.). I have seen no published criticism of the conclusions
there put forward, but some scholars have informed me that
objection has been taken in India to the identification of the
term nasag with a particular method of assessment, and it is
perhaps desirable to go into this point in some little detail. The
objection, as it has been represented to me, is to the effect that,
since nasag bears a well-defined sense in the general literature
of the period, this sense must be accepted throughout, and it is
not permissible to deduce another, and inconsistent, sense from
isolated passages. My answer is that the general sense of the
word makes nonsense of passages written by expert officials;
and that, since we are not entitled to assume that they wrote
nonsense, we must infer that, in these passages, the word is
used in a specialised, technical sense, which prevailed at the time
alongside of the general meaning, but subsequently became
obsolete. The coexistence of two senses, general and technical,
is of course no isolated phenomenon. In English at the present
day, we may write of the manners and customs of a foreign
nation, and equally we may write of the customs levied at a
foreign seaport: in the first case we are using the word “custom”
in its general sense, in the second we give it the specialised,
technical meaning of taxes on imports levied by the State, taxes
into which no element of custom now enters. Similarly, the
Persian word dastir, which in our period had various general
meanings, one of them being “custom,” meant also, in its
technical use, a schedule of assessment-rates fixed by authority,
and in no sense customary. There is no difficulty then in the
co-existence of a general and a specialised meaning for a particular
word.
In its general sense #masag means “administration,” and at
this period it was used as one of a group of terms denoting the
administrative charge of a country, province, or district. We