THE 13ta AND 1l4tH CENTURIES 43
of Ghiyasuddin indicate that they had not been exempt,
since he found it advisable to prohibit anything of the kind.
The prohibition was renewed (574) by Firiiz, so it may be
assumed that torture had been practised under Muhammad
Tughlaq. The next chronicler, Shams Afif, also records
(341) the friendly nature of the audit of Governors’ accounts
under Firiiz; but elsewhere (488 ff.) he tells how a high
officer was flogged periodically for some months in order to
recover what he had embezzled when Deputy-Governor of
Gujarat. We may infer then that, while torture was an
ordinary incident in the case of officials, it might be applied
under some kings, or in exceptional cases, even to an
officer of the rank of Governor. The subject recurs in the
sixteenth century, when, as we shall see in a later chapter,
some of Akbar’s officers practised recovery ‘‘after the
ancient fashion”; and the flogging of defaulting Governors
is recorded in the seventeenth century in the kingdom of
Golconda! It is necessary therefore, in trying to realise
the position of revenue-payers, to bear in mind that a
Governor or other official might have a very strong motive
for oppressive conduct in cases where the choice lay between
torturing defaulters and being tortured himself.
Apparently the Governors appointed by Ghiyasuddin,
while they were to be men of rank, were to hold their posts
on farming-terms, that is to say, the surplus-revenue, to be
remitted to the treasury, was to be a stated sum, and not
a matter to be settled by annually balancing accounts of
actual receipts and sanctioned expenditure. This seems
to me to be the most reasonable interpretation of the orders
that the Ministry should not make ‘an increase of more
than one-tenth or one-eleventh on the provinces and
country by surmi.c a. gu: s-werk or on the reports of
spies and the reoresenta.on oI enhancement-mongers.”
The Demand on the peasants was, as we have seen, to
be assessed by Sharing, and would therefore depend on the
seasons: the Ministry would not be in a position to vary
the amount of revenue, except by varying the share which
1 See Methwold’s Relations of the Kingdom of Golckonda, in Purchas His
Pilgrimage, 4th edition, p. 996. A Governor of Masulipatam ‘for defect
of ful payment. was beaten with canes upon the back, feet, and belly.