98 
PONTIFICIAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARVM SCRIPTA VARIA - 28 
(240-7)  Ro/Re » 1+0,(i-p) 
(240-8) R/R.  1+0,7¢ 
(240-9) C/R, ~ 6, [1-3 0, (7-p)] 
(240-10) y _C/R, «©, [1-8, (i-p)-30,(i-p)] 
(240-11) Y=C/R @, [1-0, 1-30, (i-p)] 
R £O. |. 
(240-120) TE ~T-— = (i-p)- 30] (i-p)’ 
R RO: 2 2 2 
240- == I+ °_(1- (à 
(240-13) —=1 ke®,. —-(i p}-Rè@, {(:-p) 
= = 2 
(240-14) Rew Re ~ R(1+293) 9, (i-p)* 
Rom 2 
(!) This is again the general formula (127-10) 
Rew — R t-—p)2 dO 
LC —2 ( or ee (Z — p = 0) 
Roy 2 d(i—p) 
since from relation (240-5) we have 
ae 
dis (ê—9=0 = +23) 0; 
This identity of the results is obviously necessary, but it is nonetheless 
remarkable in that it demonstrates the underlying consistency of two very 
different chains of reasoning; the first starting from (117-19) and the se- 
cond from (211-1). 
11] Allais - pag. 102