re
Im
t
er
a8
0
ar
re
ne
:d
af
vs
T-
ils:
18
10
Z
at
ne
21
wd
8
‘a
YF
1
i
UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 59
The CuairmaN. The committee stands adjourned until 1.30. I
will ask the members of the committee to wait for a few minutes for
an executive session.
Senator WAGNER. The committee hopes to conclude the hearing
to-day, I understand.
The Cuarrman. We are here and have permission to sit during
the day, so that we are at your service, Senator.
Senator WaaNER. I want to say to the committee I have some
witnesses who, I am sure, will interest all of you, who have a very
sechnical knowledge of this whole subject, and 1 hope the committee
will assemble so that they may be heard. i
Mr. Emery. Mr. Chairman, of course representing a very con-
siderable criticism of the measure from employers of substantially
between two and a half millions and three millions of men, we are
anxious to have the first opportunity we have had, during the course
of this discussion, to present our views on this bill. We had no such
opportunity in the subcommittee on the Senate side and, while we
are at the convenience and service of the committee, if the com-
mittee is to sit only to-day, we would like to be assured we will have
a fair opportunity to present those criticisms during the course of
the committee's sitting.
The CrairMAN. You will have a full opportunity.
"The committee thereupon took a recess until 1.30 o’clock p. m.)
AFTER RECESS
VY.
e
WT
\y
te
of
al
d
Tx
1
tb
4
n
f
| -
3
Ler
o
5
VQ,
>»
=
eo
Se
Oi
The Crairman, The committee will come to order. Proceed,
Senator Wagner.
Senator WAGNER. Mr. Chairman, may I present Dr. Samuel
Joseph, professor of economics of the city of New York, who desires
to present a petition on behalf of many economists who have studied
this question and who approve this legislation.
STATEMENT OF DR. SAMUEL JOSEPH, COLLEGE OF THE CITY OF
NEW YORK
Dr. SamueL Josepr. Mr. Chairman and members of the House
Judiciary Committee, it seems as if it were a coincidence, in con-
nection with Doctor Atkinson’s petition presented this morning, to
learn that at the very same time a body of whose existence we were
unaware was circulating this petition, another group of persons was
representing the same situation and presenting a somewhat similar
petition in the City of New York. It certainly looked like a case of
roincidence.
The Cuairman. Or mental telepathy?
Doctor Josep. Probably. This certainly shows-how much people
think alike. This particular group was different in that they were
men and women engaged in social problems and in the economic
aspects of labor employment questions.
The members of the committee were principally chosen for their
expert knowledge in this field and interest in the situation; and they
consisted of: David C. Adie; John B. Andrews; Paul F. Brissenden;
Robert E. Chaddock; Joseph P. Chamberlain; Edward T. Devine;
John A. Fitch; Mary B. Gilson; Shelby M. Harrison; Samuel A.
Lewisohn: Thomas I. Parkinson; Harlow S. Person; Henry R. Seager: