32 RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT [PART I
that a protection board would not work well. He also
recommended that responsible government be accorded :
the old form had worn out, the expenditure was large and
the loan commitments heavy, and the Colony should stand
in these matters on its own responsibility. On the other
hand, he later forwarded petitions from residents in the
country protesting against the grant of responsible govern-
ment. It was argued that the numbers were in favour
rather of the retention of the existing system of govern-
ment, and it was suggested that a referendum was
necessary.
The Secretary of State, in a dispatch of May 28, 18912 inti-
mated that it would not be possible to give the royal assent
to the Bill as it stood ; but he accepted the judgement of
the Colony as being in favour of responsible government.
He criticized, though not being totally opposed to, the system
of having but one chamber, as without a parallel in the rest
of the Empire in self-governing communities : he definitely
declined to allow the Supreme Chief to be required to act in
accordance with ministerial advice, though he was satisfied
with the provision made as to the reservation of Bills affecting
Asiatics or natives. He thought that the appropriation for
the natives must be made definitely a part of the constitution,
and not left vague as was proposed, and he also recommended
the omission of those clauses in the Bill which were intended
to give legislative force to the ordinary arrangements
regarding constitutional government and the position of
ministers. On the other hand, he was satisfied with the
position of the judges and of civil servants, to which the
Governor had taken exception, subject to provision being
made that civil servants should retain their existing pension
rights. He also asked that the Governor’s salary in the Civil
List should be raised from £3,000 to £4,000.
The views of the Secretary of State were communicated
to the Legislative Council, and on August 10, 18913 the
Governor sent home the Bill as amended by the Council in
* Parl. Pap., C. 6487, pp. 58 seq. * Ibid., pp. 71 seq.
Ibid., C. 7013, pp. 5 seq.