CHAP. 1] THE GOVERNOR
23
Canadian system under which the Central Government
appoints provincial governors, and if the people of Australia
were to desire to adopt a similar system His Majesty's
Government would in all probability be disposed to advise
His Majesty that the necessary steps should be taken to carry
out their wishes.
7. So far, I understand there has been no indication that
the States, whose contention is that they remain sovereign
States, would desire that their prerogatives should be
diminished, and the evidence of such sovereignty is in part
secured by making the appointment of Governor in the same
manner and on the same terms as prior to federation.
8. I am sending a copy of this despatch to the other
State Governors and to the Governor-General.
This dispatch formed the subject of discussion in the
Queensland Assembly in 1909, in the Victorian Assembly in
1910, and in the Assembly of Western Australia, where a mem-
ber of the Labour party brought forward, on September 7,
1910, a motion to use Government House as a site for the
University, with the idea also of terminating the appointment
of a Governor from home. But it was agreed almost unani-
mously that the plan was not a desirable one, and the motion
was rejected, it being felt that if anything were to be done it
must, as suggested by Lord Crewe, be done by the State
Governments acting together and approaching the Imperial
Government. It isindeed clear that the change could only be
made when the states have decided to abandon in some
measure at least their independence. There are, moreover,
obvious objections to the selection of the Chief Justice as
Governor :1 as head of the Executive he would have to exer-
cise the prerogative of mercy, and though he would normally
act on ministerial advice, yet it is clear that it would be
impossible to treat the matter in anything like so satisfactory
a manner as at present, when the Executive and the judiciary
are normally independent. Nor is the force of this objection
! The Chief Justice also has local ties, and recently the Chief Justice of
Tasmania was accused of misusing his position as administrator to obtain
information of pecuniary value, though the charge was declared unfounded
by the Commissioner who examined into it ; see Hobart Mercury, May 14,
910.