cusp. 1] THE POWERS OF THE GOVERNOR 107
If the plea is to be regarded as a plea of privilege only,
and as claiming immunity to the Governor from liability
to be sued in the courts of the Colony, their Lordships
think that it cannot, in that aspect of it, be sustained.
The dictum attributed to Lord Mansfield in Fabrigas v.
Mostyn! that ‘ the Governor of a Colony is in the nature of
a viceroy, and therefore locally during his government no
civil or criminal action will lie against him ; the reason is,
because upon process he would be subject to imprisonment,’
was dissented from and declared to be without legal founda-
tion in the judgment of the Lords of the Judicial Committee
delivered by Lord Brougham in the case of Hill v. Bigge.?
In that appeal their Lordships were of opinion that the plea
of the Lieutenant Governor of the Island of Trinidad to
an action brought against him in the civil court of the island,
claiming that whilst Lieutenant Governor he was not liable
to be sued in that court, could not be sustained. The action
was for a private debt contracted by the defendant in
England before he became Governor, but the principle
affirmed by the judgment is that the Governor of a Colony,
under the commission usually issued by the Crown cannot
claim, as a personal privilege, exemption from being sued
in the courts of the Colony. The claim to such exemption
is thus met :— If it be said that the Governor of a Colony
is quasi sovereign, the answer is, that he does not even
represent the Sovereign generally, having only the functions
delegated to him by the term of his commission, and being
only the officer to execute the specific powers with which
that commission clothes him.’
The defendant has sought to strengthen his claim of
privilege by averring in his plea that the acts complained
of were done by him ‘as Governor’, and ‘as acts of State’.
Their Lordships propose hereafter to consider the particular
averments of this plea. It is enough here to say that it
appears to them that if the Governor cannot claim exemp-
tion from being sued in the courts of the Colony in which
he holds that office, as a personal privilege, simply from his
being Governor, and is obliged to go further, his plea must
then show by proper and sufficient averments that the acts
complained of were acts of State policy within the limits
of his commission, and were done by him as the servant
of the Crown, so as to be, as they are sometimes shortly
termed, acts of State. A plea, however, disclosing these
facts would raise more than a question of personal exemption
1 Cowp. 161. * 3 Moo. P. C. 465.