138 THE EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT [PaRT iI
receive a pardon after conviction, but it is a striking case
of the difficulty which a Governor may incur if he acts on
the advice of ministers in a manner which is criminal. In
a recent case in Natal in 1906 the magistrate declined to
issue process against the Governor of Natal.l
$9. THE GOVERNOR'S LIABILITY To MANDAMUS
The question of the liability of the Governor of a state
to the issue of a mandamus was decided in the case of The
King v. The Governor of the State of South Australia? which
came in 1907 before the High Court of the Commonwealth.
The question arose out of a disputed return for an election
of senators for the State of South Australia, at the end of 1906.
Of the three candidates who were returned at the election,
the election of one was declared by the High Court, as a Court
of Disputed Returns, to be void, and accordingly on July 2,
1907, the Governor forwarded a message to the Legislative
Council and the Legislative Assembly of the state, informing
them of the vacancy in the representation of the state in the
Senate, and saying that he was advised that the vacancy
should be filled by the Houses of Parliament sitting together,
as laid down by s. 15 of the Commonwealth Constitution for
the case when the place of a senator had become vacant
hefore the expiration of his time of office.
It was contended by supporters of the unseated senator,
Mr. Vardon, that a fresh election should be held, and that
the appointment should not be made by the Houses of
Parliament ; but despite the protest, the Houses of Parlia-
ment at a joint sitting on the 11th of July elected Mr. J. V.
O’Loghlin to fill the vacancy. An order nisi for a mandamus
to the Governor was then granted by the High Court on
the ground that a new election ought to have been held,
' Cf. Parl. Pap., Cd. 4403, p. 129.
'4 C. L. R. 1497. Curiously enough, the Court of British Guiana in
1907 had the same issue before it in the shape of an attempt to mandamus
a Governor to grant a certain concession in respect of rubber-bearing lands.
It inclined to think a mandamus would lie, but held that the law gave the
Governor an absolute discretion, and so did not decide the point.