Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

cpap. 1] THE POWERS OF THE GOVERNOR 141 
remit the term of punishment in accordance with such 
regulations. 
The Governor in Council had power to remit the term 
of imprisonment of the applicant ; he had not done so, and 
the most that the High Court could be asked to do would 
be to issue a mandamus to the Governor in Council to 
consider the matter. But no mandamus lay to the Gover- 
nor in Council! and no court had jurisdiction to review the 
discretion of the Governor in Council in the exercise of 
the prerogative of mercy. 
The rule is obviously reasonable and sensible, though a 
certain anomaly is possible. If a statute throws upon 
a minister a certain duty, a mandamus will lie to him, if 
he has a special duty towards members of the public as well 
as a duty to the Crown. But in a similar case, if the Governor 
or the Governor in Council were specified as the person to 
perform the duty there would be no redress by mandamus. 
The difficulties of endeavouring to enforce the action of 
a Government by mandamus are too obvious to need 
discussion : if a duty is imposed on the Governor or the 
Governor in Council, it must be assumed that the intention 
is to reserve the performance of the duty for the deliberate 
action of the Government as a political entity, and to 
remove the matter from the arbitration of the Courts, 
Where the line is to be drawn cannot, of course, be settled 
by anything save the will of the Parliament. 
§ 10. PErITIONS OF RIcHT 
Here may be mentioned another prerogative of the Crown 
which is not delegated to the Governor by the letters patent, 
and which cannot be exercised by him unless under statute. 
It is a rule of law that the Crown and its servants cannot 
be sued on official contracts. It is recognized that these 
! So in Canada the same doctrine has been applied even to a Lieutenant- 
Governor by Taschereau J. in Church v. Ml iddlemiss, 21 L. C. J., at p. 319, 
and, by Papineau J. in Molson v. Chapleau, 6 L. N., at p. 224. See Lefroy, 
Legislative Power in Canada, pp. 95-7; and cf. Hamburg America Packet 
Oo. v. The King, 33 8. C. R. 252; inre Sooka Nand Verma,7T W. A. L. R. 225.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.