xxxii TABLE OF CASES CITED 
mn re Wi Matue’s Will, [1908] A.C. Windsor v. Commercial Bank of 
448: 1357 n. 1. Windsor, 3 R. & (. 420; 3 Cart. 
Wi Parata v. Bishop of Wellington, 377: 704 n. 3. 
3 N.ZJ.R. (N.S.) A.C. 72: 1059  Wollaston’s Case, 28 V.L.R. 357 : 823 
n. 1, 1104. n.1, 1368 n. 2. 
Wilkinson v. Downton, [1897] 2 Q.B. Woodruff v. Attorney-General for 
57: 1385 n. 5. Ontario, [1908] A.C. 508 : 381 n. 2, 
Williams v. Booth, 10 C.L.R. 342: 722 n. 2. 
679 n. 1. Woodworkers’ Case, 8 C.L.R. 465: 
Williams v. Giddy, [1911] A.C. 381 : 886 n. 2. 
349 n. 2. ex parte Worms, 22 L.C.J. 109; 2 
Williams v. Howarth, [1905] A.C. 551 : Cart. 315: 413, 666 n. 
143 n.1, 1456. Wright v. Fitzgerald, 27 S'. Tr. 759: 
Villiamson v. Commonwealth, 5 C.L.R. 271. 
174: 349 n. 2. Wright v. Wright, 13 C/-T.R. 881: 
Willis v. Sir George Gipps, 5 Moo. P.C. 1244 n. 
379: 1341 n.1. Wright v. Wright, 26 N.L.R. 651: 
Willis v. Machray, [1910] A.C. 476 : 1240 n. 1. 
893 n. L. 
Villoughby v. Panapa Waikopi, 29 
N.ZL.R. 1123 : 1059 n. 1. . 
Wilson v. McGuire, 2 O.R. 118; 2 
Cart. 665: 701 n.7. 
Winans v. Attorney-General (No. 2), 
11910] A.C. 27 (cf. re Consuelo 
Duchess of Manchester, Duncan- 
won Vv. Manchester, Times, Feb. 13. 
1912): 721 n. 6. 
2 Windsor v. Annapolis Railway Co., 
1 R,. &G 312: 83 Cart. 387: 667 n. 
Zacklynsk: v. Polushie, [19081A.C. 65 : 
1437 n. 2.