Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

460 PARLIAMENTS OF THE DOMINIONS [rar rit 
documents. But in the session of 1844-5 the Speaker 
refused a motion written in French, on the ground that to 
receive it would be a violation of the Union Act, and on an 
appeal to the House his decision was upheld. In 1848 the 
provisions of the Union Act in this regard were repealed : 
the measure had been urged by three successive Governors- 
General, and when an address from the Legislative Assembly 
was sent in 1845 the Imperial Government by a dispatch 
from Mr. Gladstone of February 3, 1846, promised repeal, 
which was defended by Lord Grey in the House of Lords as 
being proper, on the principle of allowing all their local 
concerns to be regulated according to the wishes and feelings 
of the people of Canada. Lord Elgin had the pleasure of 
announcing the decision of the Imperial Parliament in his 
speech on opening the Legislature on January 18, 1849, for 
it was a measure which he had urged energetically upon the 
consideration of the Imperial Government. 
S. 133 of the British North America Act provides that 
either the English or the French language may be used by 
any person in the debates of the Houses of the Parliament of 
the Dominion of Canada and of the Houses of the Legislature 
of Quebec, and both those languages shall be used in the 
respective records and journals of the Houses, and either of 
those languages may be used by any person or in any pleading 
Or process in or issuing from any Court of Canada established 
under the Act and in or from all or any of the Courts of 
Quebec. The Acts of the Parliament of Canada and of the 
Legislature of Quebec are to be printed in both these lan- 
guages. Under this provision everything in the Canadian 
Parliament is duplicated and issued in French as well as in 
English : the statutes and the Bills alike are printed in both 
languages, and recently steps have been taken to accelerate 
the rapidity of the French version of the proceedings, but the 
sessions of 1910 and 1911 opened as usual with complaints of 
delay by Mr. Landry, and amendment was promised. The 
expense is large, and the utility of much of the printing nal. 
! Houston, Constitutional Documents of Canada, pp. 162, 175, 183, 213; 
cf. Pope, Sir John Macdonald, ii. 249, 250 ; Imperial Act 11 & 12 Vict. 
¢. 56.5. 1. For Lord Durham’s policy, sce Report, pp. 110 seq.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.