Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

862 THE FEDERATIONS AND THE UNION [PART 1V 
general recognition of Her Majesty’s continued sovereignty 
under the Act of 1867, it appeared to the Privy Council 
that so far as regards vesting in the Crown the same 
consequences must follow in the case of non-territorial 
provincial revenues.! 
It is important to notice that the position of Lieutenant- 
Governor and his functions cannot be affected by any 
Canadian Act whatever, not excepting a Federal Act, for 
the power to alter the constitution given by the British North 
America Act to each provincial legislature does not extend to 
altering the provisions of the Imperial Act regarding the posi- 
tion of Lieutenant-Governor, and the Dominion Parliament 
has no express or implied authority to affect the constitution 
of a province. But it is no alteration of the position of the 
office merely to confer on him fresh power and duties. 
On this subject there has been a good deal of discussion 
by Ministers of Justice in Canada. Thus in 1887 an Act of 
Manitoba (48 Vict. c. 2) respecting the Lieutenant-Governor 
was disallowed.® That Act created the Lieutenant-Governor 
and his successors a corporation sole, required that all bonds, 
recoghizances, and other proceedings at law should be taken 
in the name of his office and be recovered by him in his name 
of office and should not vest in him personally. It empowered 
him to create deputies to sign marriage licences, money 
warrants, letters patent of incorporation, licences to incor- 
porate companies, &c., and commissions under any Act of 
the Legislature. Sir John Thompson held that the making 
* What would happen if the Dominion, the Province, and the Imperial 
Government were all creditors of a Canadian bank and there were insuffi- 
cient assets to pay them all ? There is no authority, but counsel in this 
case before the Supreme Court of New Brunswick answered that they 
would share pro rata, which seems good sense ; see 27 N. B. 87 9, at p. 385. 
This case is not really so opposed to the view of Fournier J., in Attorney- 
General of British Columbia v. Atiorney-General of Canada, 14 8. C. R. 343, at 
p. 363, as Lefroy, p. 82, suggests. The Crown is one, but has different 
aspects; of, the Privy Council in Dominion of Canada v. Province of 
Ontario, [1910] A. C. 637, at p. 645. 
* Lefroy, Legislative Power in Canada, pp. 100-12, 239, 295, 296. 
* Provincial Legislation, 1867-95, p. 821.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.