Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

CHAP, 1] THE DOMINION OF CANADA 681 
Moreover, after many years, the Judicial Committee * upset 
at last the absurd idea that the power of appointing Queen’s 
Counsel was one only to be used by the Governor-General. In 
all these cases it is important to note that the decision of 
the Privy Council at once restored the just equilibrium of the 
powers of the several factors in the constitution : the power 
of the Governor-General to pardon is to pardon offences 
against Dominion laws and offences which can be tried by 
Colonial Courts by virtue of Imperial Acts. That he should 
have pardoned persons who were not convicted of more than 
breaches of provincial regulations would have been indeed 
unwise. Similarly it is for the Governor-General to deter- 
mine precedence in Dominion Courts, and for the provincial 
authorities to do so as regards Provincial Courts. Thus in 
1907 the new provinces, Saskatchewan (c. 21) and Alberta 
{c. 20), arranged for the appointment of King’s Counsel and 
the grant of precedence. 
(9) Ferries 
The question of the Dominion control over ferries may 
conveniently be considered in this connexion. The power 
given under s. 91 (13) is power with regard to ferries between 
a province and any British or foreign country, or between 
two provinces, and the nature and extent of this power was 
considered elaborately by the Supreme Court on a reference 
by the Governor-General in Council in re Inter-Provincial 
and International Ferries? It was contended for the Province 
of Ontario that the jurisdiction with regard to ferries con- 
ferred upon the Dominion was merely the power of the regu- 
lation of ferries when they had been granted by provincial 
authorities, and it was contended that under s. 109 of the 
British North America Act the proprietary right in ferries 
and the royal prerogative to grant a ferry were vested in the 
* The Attorney-General for the Dominion of Canada v. The Attorney- 
General for the Province of Ontario, [1898] A. C. 247; 23 0. A. R. 792. 
* 36 8. C. R. 206, overruling Perry v. Clerque, 5 0. R. 357. Non-inter- 
Provincial or international ferries fall within the jurisdiction of the provinces, 
ander s. 92 (16), and perhaps s.92 (2): see Dinner v. Humberstone. (1396) 
26 8. (I. R. 252. at pp. 266. 267.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.