Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

696 - THE FEDERATIONS AND THE UNION [PART 1V 
any school under the provisions of the agreement, and where 
both Roman Catholic and non-Roman Catholic children 
attended the school, and there was not adequate room to 
allow for separate accommodation for religious teaching, the 
Department of Education was to make regulations so that 
the Roman Catholic children could be taught on half the days 
of the month, and the non-Roman Catholic children on the 
other half. But during the secular school work no separation 
of the pupils was to take place. No pupils were to be per- 
mitted to be present at any religious teaching unless the 
parents or guardians desired it; otherwise they must either 
be kept in another room or dismissed before religious teach- 
ing took place. 
As regards language, the settlement arranged was that 
when ten of the pupils in any school spoke the French 
language, or any other language than English as their native 
language, the teaching of such pupils should be conducted 
in French, or such other language, and in English, upon the 
bilingual system. 
In Ontario there has been a decision in The Separate School 
Trustees of Belleville v. Grainger! that the appeal under s. 93 
(3) lies only where some legal act is concerned, not merely 
because of matters affecting the everyday working of the 
school. 
(m) The Privileges of the Legislatures 
For a time it was contended by the Courts that a Provincial 
Legislature, in token of its absolutely subordinate position, 
could not pass an Act for conferring upon itself privileges 
equal to those of the House of Commons. This view was 
shared originally by the Dominion Government, and two 
Acts of Ontario and Quebec on this topic were disallowed. 
The same fate was awarded an Ontario and a Manitoba Act 
of 1874, but, with the usual inconsistency of Dominion action, 
an Act of 1876 was not disallowed. The Court of Queen’s 
Bench in Quebec held that a statute of Quebec on this 
subject was ulira vires. On the other hand, it was shown 
clearly by the case of Woodworth? decided by the Supreme 
' 25Gr, 570; 1 Cart. 816. * 28. CR. 158. Sceabove, Pp. 450 seq.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.