Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

CHAP, 1] THE DOMINION OF CANADA 737 
the prerogative right of disallowance by the Federal Govern- 
ment would always be considered a harsh exercise of power, 
unless in cases of great and manifest necessity, or where the 
Act was so clearly beyond the powers of the local legislature 
that the propriety of interfering would be recognized at 
once. They also admitted that the power could even be 
applied to a law over which the Provincial Legislature had 
complete jurisdiction, but it would always be a difficult 
Matter for the Federal Government to substitute its opinion 
instead of that of the legislative assemblies in regard to 
Inatters within their province, without exposing themselves 
bo be reproached with threatening the independence of the 
Provinces. There were, however, even in this period cases 
of disallowance of Acts on other than legal or constitutional 
grounds, or the withholding of the assent to Bills which had 
been reserved, but these were mainly in respect of enact- 
ments of British Columbia! and Manitoba,? which stand 
a peculiar position to the more settled provinces of the 
cast, especially as regards land surveying and the regulation 
of the legal profession. One interesting case arose as regards 
Quebec ; the Lieutenant-Governor assented in 1877 inad- 
vertently to a Bill which he was assured had duly passed both 
Houses ; ag 5 matter of fact it had done so, but had only 
been read twice in the Assembly, and on finding out the 
orror the Dominion Government was asked by the Lieutenant- 
Governor to take steps to disallow the Act. Mr, Blake, 
however, as Minister of J ustice, declined to comply with this 
request, pointing out that the assent, having been improperly 
8lven, was mere nullity, and suggesting that the disallowance 
of a nullity would be improper, though the Quebec Legislature 
Might pass, if it liked, an Act next session declaring that the 
Act of the previous session was void : it did not do so, but 
It Was agreed not to print the Act among the Acts of the 
Session, and so it never appeared as an Act at all on the 
Statute book? In 1876, however, a Manitoba Act (38 Vict. 
©. 37) was disallowed because it had not been duly published 
Canada Sess. Pay., 1877, No. 89, p. 174. 
hid, Pp. 179, 230, 307. ® Ibid., 1879. Nos. 19 and 26.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.