790 THE FEDERATIONS AND THE UNION [PART IV
Constitution, on the other hand, at once places all the old
constitutions on a new basis by subordinating the executive
head of the province to the control of the Governor-General
and by subjecting the legislative power to disallowance by
the Governor-General in Council. Moreover, the distribution
of power is of an essentially different character in form at
least ; the states have all their powers save so far as they
are expressly taken away, and the provinces have only such
powers as are expressly left to them. It is true that the
difference is more in appearance, perhaps, than in reality,
for the exclusive and paramount powers deprive the states
of much of their old authority, but the difference is in
principle essential, and marks the dependence of the
Commonwealth Constitution on the American model, which
was constantly before the minds of the delegates who
framed the Constitution.
In the constitution of the legislative power of the Common-
wealth there is, in accordance with United States models, a
deliberate attempt to secure some measure of state influence.
The Senate is composed of six members from each state
who are elected at present by the electors—not by the
Legislature, as in the United States—each state as a single
constituency. Half retire every three years (those to retire
being decided originally by the receipt of the lowest number
of votes in each state), the tenure of office being six years.
The Parliament may make laws diminishing or increasing the
number of senators, but the representation of each original
state shall be equal, and there shall never be less than six
senators for each state which was an original state. More-
over, in the case of a casual vacancy in the representation
of a state the election is to be made by the two Houses of
the State Parliament sitting together, and not by the people,
and the Governor in Council may appoint a senator to hold
office until fourteen days after the Houses meet, if the
vacancy occurs when they are not sitting. It was thought
that in this way the smaller states would be able to secure
power over finance and over arrangements likely to affect
v Cf. Clark, Australian Constitutional Law, pp. 358-87.