Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

794 THE FEDERATIONS AND THE UNION [PART IV 
was exhaustively discussed the question of the relations of 
the Crown in the states to that of the Crown in the Common- 
wealth. 
The point arose out of the question whether the Crown 
in the states was bound by the provisions of the Customs 
Act of 1901, in respect of goods imported by the Crown in 
the state for the use of the state. 
The Government of New South Wales imported wire 
netting, which it was intended to distribute at a moderate 
cost to farmers in New South Wales, and they set up a claim 
in the first place that the goods were not subject to any 
control by the Commonwealth customs authorities, and in 
the second place that the goods were not subject to the duties 
of the customs. They relied partly on the doctrine that 
statutes did not bind the Crown except by express order, or 
necessary implication, and partly also on the provisions 
of s. 114 of the Constitution, which forbids the imposition of 
a tax upon the property of a state by the Commonwealth. 
The High Court decided against the Government of New 
South Wales. The substance of the decision was based on 
the ground that for customs matters the whole control of 
customs must be given by the Constitution to the Common- 
wealth (see ss. 52 (2), 86, and 90). The Crown was the 
Crown in the Commonwealth. 
It was laid down that the constitution binds the Crown 
as represented by the states, and takes no count of the 
states and States Governments in relation to Commonwealth 
legislation in matters within the exclusive control of the 
Commonwealth Government, and therefore, in the construc- 
tion of Commonwealth statutes dealing with such matters, 
the rule that the Crown is not bound by statute applies 
to the sovereign as head of the Commonwealth Government, 
and not as head of the State Governments. 
It was pointed out by the Court that if the principle were 
conceded, then the states could have made the customs laws 
and duties of customs illusory by importing largely and selling 
for the benefit of private individuals. But the decision rested 
in the main on the constitutional ground indicated above.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.