798 THE FEDERATIONS AND THE UNION [PART IV
actually transferred, or upon which the Commonwealth
Parliament had power to make laws and had legislated,
the Commonwealth Government was the proper channel
of communication with the Imperial Government. In all
other matters the proper channel of communication was the
States Governor. They did not know whether the Common-
wealth could legislate, under its power to make laws with
respect to external affairs given by the constitution (s. 51
(xxix)), so as to enforce Imperial treaties and to punish state
officers who violated such treaties, but no such law had yet
been made, and if an officer were charged with contravening
an Imperial obligation of this kind, the Commonwealth
Government had no power even to call upon him for an
explanation, much less to punish him if he had done wrong.
It would be absurd to make the Commonwealth Government
the channel of communication in matters in which they were
powerless to act, and it would be an indignity to the South
Australian Government, with whom at present lay the duty
of maintaining within its borders Imperial treaties, if it
were compelled to approach His Majesty’s Government
through the medium of any other Government. The fact
that the High Court had original jurisdiction of ‘ matters
arising under any treaty ’ or ‘ matters affecting the position
of Consuls ’ did not transfer these questions to the executive
control of the Commonwealth Government; the State
Courts retained jurisdiction with regard to these cases. On
the other hand, the Government of the Commonwealth !
held that the matter to be investigated fell directly within
the sphere of the Commonwealth’s action. The fulfilment
of treaty obligations was obviously one of those external
affairs peculiarly federal which could not be dealt with
independently by each state without producing an intolerable
condition of confusion prolific in international complications.
Trade and commerce with other countries and shipping were
also specifically placed under Commonwealth control, and
' See Mr. Deakin’s memorandum of September 26, 1902 ; ibid., pp. 10,
11. The views of South Australia were given by Mr. Jenkins and
Mr. Gordon.