802 THE FEDERATIONS AND THE UNION [PART IV
the local executive. It has done so in implicit reliance on
the co-operation and good will of the Colonial Executives,
and in the confident faith that Imperial obligations are held
as sacred by the people and the ministers of the Crown in
the Dominions of His Majesty beyond the Seas as they are
by the people and Government of this country.
That confidence has been amply justified by the steadfast
loyalty of the Colonies and their ministers, and I have no
doubt that in like manner in the case of Australia when the
change made by the Commonwealth Constitution Act is fully
understood the position of the federal authority as an
intermediary will not in any way impair that loyalty or the
cordiality with which any request for explanation or assis-
tance has been met by the Governments of the several states
now merged in the Commonwealth.
I do not gather that your ministers wish to contend that
the question which arose in regard to the Vondel was not
a ‘ federal > matter, but that it only contends that as it was
one in regard to which the State Executive could, in present
circumstances, alone take action, application should have
been made direct to them. That contention I have dealt
fully with above, and it does not appear to be necessary to
enter into the question of the precise meaning to be attached
to the words ‘ external affairs’ in the Constitution Act ;
but I concur in the view of the Federal Government that
the special provisions of Article 75 in respect to matters
‘arising under any treaty ’, and matters ‘ affecting Consuls
or other representatives of other countries ’, imply that such
questions are of special federal concern.
I regret that your ministers should regard it as humiliating
to them that communications on federal matters should pass
through the Federal Government. That feeling does not
appear to be shared by the other State Governments, and
I am confident that when your Government have further
considered the position, they will loyally accept what was
undoubtedly the will of Parliament and of the people of
Australia.
The Federal Government also argued at great length in
minutes by the Attorney-General of November 12, 1902, and
by the Prime Minister of November 21, 1902, in favour of
the view that the proper mode of correspondence was
through the Governor-General! On the other hand, the
t Parl, Pap., Cd. 1587, pp. 15-22,