Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

582 PARLIAMENTS OF THE DOMINIONS [PART III 
£3. QUEENSLAND 
In the case of general legislation in Queensland matters 
came to a head at the end of 19071 The Ministry of that 
day—Mr. Kidston’s—commanded some twenty-four mem- 
bers in the Legislative Assembly. There were in coalition 
with him seventeen Labour members and an Opposition 
which numbered thirty-one members. The coalition was 
fairly close, but not, of course, perfect. The Legislative 
Council in that session rejected two measures sent up from 
the Lower House, namely a measure to abolish postal voting 
and a measure to establish wages boards. The postal voting 
measure had been introduced because of the feeling that 
the postal vote enabled influence to be brought to bear on the 
voters, more especially women, and that the result of this 
influence was beneficial to the party in opposition. The 
Wages Board Bill was obnoxious to the Opposition because 
of its attempt to apply its terms to agricultural pursuits— 
a matter of considerable importance in a country like 
Queensland. Mr. Kidston was anxious to obtain assurances 
from the Governor that if the Upper House persisted in 
its opposition he would sanction the addition of sufficient 
members to overcome that opposition. It was not desired 
to exercise this power if it could be avoided; the idea 
rather was that by the Governor letting it be known that 
he would be prepared to accept advice the necessity of the 
advice being tendered would be avoided. To this, of course, 
there was no constitutional objection; indeed it was in 
exact accordance with the step taken in England at the time 
of the passing of the Reform Act of 1832. But the Governor 
felt unable to accept the advice of the Ministry, and accord- 
ingly Mr. Kidston resigned, and the Governor sent at once 
for Mr. Philp, the leader of the Opposition, and asked him 
to form a Ministry. Mr. Philp did so, but in the Lower 
House he found himself unable to obtain supply. The 
majority in that House protested that a change of Ministry 
was undesirable, that they were willing to proceed with 
* See Parliamentary Debates, c. 1735 seq. ; ci. 38 seq.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.