HAP. 11] THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 843
the sense usual in 1900, the Constitution gave the Parliament
power to say what marks should be recognized as trade-
marks and what not, and the meaning of the expression in
1900 gave the centre, not the circumference, of the power.
He countered the obvious argument that the power of defi-
nition might be used to arrogate a power not conferred by the
Constitution by quoting the case of Attorney-General for
Quebec v. Queen Insurance Co. in which the Privy Council
rejected the attempt of a provincial legislature in Canada
bo enact a stamp tax (which under the British North America
Act, 1867, it has no power to do) by imposing what was really
such a tax in the form of a business licence.
(¢) Control of Companies?
The question of the power of the Commonwealth Parlia-
ment with regard to the control of companies was exhaus-
tively considered in the case of Huddart Parker and Company
Proprietary Limited v. Moorehead? which was decided by
the High Court in 1908, and in the decision of which they
applied their usual principle of asserting that Commonwealth
legislation must not interfere with the reserved power of the
states to deal with internal trade and commerce.
Theye were two points at issue in the case. The first was
as to the validity of s. 15 B of the Australian Industries
Preservation Act, 1906, as amended by Act No. 5 of 1908 ; the
second was the question of the validity of ss. 5 and 8 of the
former Act. 8.15 B gave to the Controller-General of Customs
the power to ask certain questions if he believed that an
offence had been committed against partii of the Act. It
was held by the whole Court that the inquiry thus authorized
was in no way inconsistent with the right to trial by jury con-
ferred by s. 80 of the Constitution ; that such an inquiry was
not an exercise of the judicial power of the Commonwealth,
and that such an inquiry was not an incident of the execu-
tion and maintenance of the provisions of the Constitution
' 3 App. Cas. 1090.
* Cf. Quick and Garran, Constitution of Commonwealth, pp. 578, 579
as to banks), 604-8; Keith, Journ. Soc. Comp. Leg., xii. 108 seq.
® 8 C. L. R. 330. See Harrison Moore, op. cit., pp. 469-73.