Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

crap. 11] THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 897 
no one was very enthusiastic about it, for it compelled the 
Federal Government to raise four times the revenue which 
it wanted for the purpose of raising a federal revenue of 
any size, since the other most important revenue-producing 
measure was the postal revenue. But the real resistance 
grew strong when it was decided in 1908, on the expiration of 
the book-keeping system, to alter the purely cash system 
of accounts established by the Constitution. The Audit Act, 
1906, had authorized the establishment of trust accounts by 
the treasurer to which should be carried all moneys appro- 
priated to the purposes thereof by Parliament. The Surplus 
Revenue Act, 1908, s. 4 (4) (d), now provided that all pay- 
ments to trust funds established under the Audit Act, 1901- 
1906, of moneys appropriated by law for any purpose of the 
Commonwealth should be deemed to be expenditure, and 
that any such appropriation should not lapse at the end 
of the financial year for the service of which it was made. 
In other words, the system was no longer to be followed of 
debiting the states with the actual expenditure, but with the 
amount of expenditure which the Parliament had authorized. 
Moreover, the Parliament authorized the accumulation of 
funds in respect of services to be undertaken in subsequent 
years. The new proposal was bitterly attacked in Parlia- 
ment as contrary to the Constitution ; it was urged! that 
the device was illegitimate, that the states were entitled 
to everything not actually expended, that appropriation 
was not expenditure, and that nothing by the usage of 
Parliament could be deemed to be expenditure if it were 
not voted by Parliament for the actual service of the year. 
Moreover, it was urged that a direction that money be 
carried to a trust account was not even in a parliamentary 
sense appropriation, since it did not make the money avail- 
able for handling by the Executive Government. The pro- 
vision in question could be used to nullify the constitutional 
right of the states to surplus revenue by allowing the Com- 
monwealth to put aside whatever it wanted, nominally for 
« Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates, 1908, pp. 11810 seq. (Mr. Bruce 
Smith), 11833 seq. (Mr. Reid). Cf. Quick and Garran, p. 825. 
1979-2 7
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.