Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

cap. ii] THE UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA 963 
hand, it was argued that there was little chance of the 
passing of any disfranchising measure of this kind, and 
that the safeguard of a two-thirds majority of both Houses 
should be adequate. The Bloemfontein Conference strength- 
ened the position by in effect requiring any such Bill to be 
reserved,! and in introducing the Bill in the House of Lords, 
Lord Crewe indicated that such a Bill might be refused the 
royal assent.? 
Under the original draft the election of members of the 
Assembly was to take place on the principle of proportional 
representation with the single transferable vote, and the 
Governor-General in Council was to issue regulations as to 
the arrangements for counting the votes on this principle ; 
on such regulations being promulgated they were to have 
the force of law unless and until Parliament otherwise 
provided ; but at the Bloemfontein Conference this proposal 
was rejected at the wish of the Cape and the Orange River 
as a compromise in order to obtain the retention of the prin- 
ciple of equal electoral areas. 
The Governor-General has, as formerly in the Cape, the 
anusual power of dissolving both Houses simultaneously 
or of dissolving the Assembly only ;® he cannot, however, 
dissolve the Senate for ten years after the Union, and in no 
case is the dissolution to affect senators nominated by the 
Governor-General in Council. There must be a session 
every year! The Parliament will sit at Capetown (s. 23), 
though the capital of the Union for other purposes is Pre- 
toria (s. 18), while the Supreme Court will sit normally at 
Bloemfontein. 
The disqualifications for membership of the two Houses 
are the same :® they follow the usual lines and include 
1 A clause is placed in the royal instructions to this effect, as the legal 
juestion is not free from doubt; see Colonel Seely in House of Commons 
Debates, ix, 1635, 1636, who had discussed the matter with Mr. Schreiner, 
* See House of Lords Debates, ii. 761, 863-5. Cf. Lord Curzon (766), 
Lord Lansdowne (795), Archbishop of Canterbury (789 seq.) ; see House of 
Commons, ix. 1634 seq., 958 seq. (Colonel Seely). 
® 5 20. 1g, 22. % 5.53. 
Dd2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.